Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 19 of 19

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Trapped In Public: The Regulation Of Street Harassment And Cyber-Harassment Under The Captive Audience Doctrine, Joanne Sweeny Apr 2019

Trapped In Public: The Regulation Of Street Harassment And Cyber-Harassment Under The Captive Audience Doctrine, Joanne Sweeny

JoAnne Sweeny

No abstract provided.


When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. V. Hill (1967), Samantha Barbas Nov 2017

When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. V. Hill (1967), Samantha Barbas

Samantha Barbas

Drawing on previously unexplored and unpublished archival papers of Richard Nixon, the plaintiffs’ lawyer in the case, and the justices of the Warren Court, this article tells the story of the seminal First Amendment case Time, Inc. v. Hill (1967). In Hill, the Supreme Court for the first time addressed the conflict between the right to privacy and freedom of the press. The Court constitutionalized tort liability for invasion of privacy, acknowledging that it raised First Amendment issues and must be governed by constitutional standards. Hill substantially diminished privacy rights; today it is difficult if not impossible to recover against …


“Can I Profit From My Own Name And Likeness As A College Athlete?” The Predictive Legal Analytics Of A College Player’S Publicity Rights Vs. First Amendment Rights Of Others, Roger M. Groves Jul 2014

“Can I Profit From My Own Name And Likeness As A College Athlete?” The Predictive Legal Analytics Of A College Player’S Publicity Rights Vs. First Amendment Rights Of Others, Roger M. Groves

Roger M. Groves

Two federal court decisions during 2013 have changed the game for college students versus the schools, the NCAA and video game makers. This article explores whether for the first time in history these athletes can profit from their own name and likeness and prevent others from doing so. But those cases still leave many untested applications to new facts – facts that the courts have not faced. Particularly intriguing is how 21st Century technology will apply to this area in future litigation. No publicity rights case or article to date has explored the application of predictive analytics, computer programs, algorithms, …


A New First Amendment Goal Line Defense – Stopping The Right Of Publicity Offense, Mark Conrad Feb 2014

A New First Amendment Goal Line Defense – Stopping The Right Of Publicity Offense, Mark Conrad

Mark A. Conrad

The use of images with the recognizable features of former NCAA student-athletes by a digital video firm has resulted in two highly publicized lawsuits by former college players claiming violations of their right of publicity. Thus far, two federal appeals courts – the Third Circuit in Hart v. Electronic Arts and the Ninth Circuit in Keller v. Electronic Arts -- have refused to dismiss their claims, concluding that the use of the player images constitute a valid cause of action. While their actions have garnered sympathy among the public and many scholars, it is the author’s contention that both lawsuits …


A New First Amendment Goal Line Defense – It’S Time To Stop The Right Of Publicity Offensive, Mark Conrad Aug 2013

A New First Amendment Goal Line Defense – It’S Time To Stop The Right Of Publicity Offensive, Mark Conrad

Mark A. Conrad

No abstract provided.


A New First Amendment Goal Line Defense – It’S Time To Stop The Right Of Publicity Offensive, Mark A. Conrad Aug 2013

A New First Amendment Goal Line Defense – It’S Time To Stop The Right Of Publicity Offensive, Mark A. Conrad

Mark A. Conrad

What began as a novel subset of traditional privacy rights has led courts and legislatures to create a property-based right of publicity jurisprudence that has gone beyond its original goals and now crept into the traditional First Amendment domain of protection of artistic and creative rights. In the last two decades, courts have applied the “right of publicity” doctrine in various artistic contexts and various tests devised by the courts to balance the competing interests of free speech and commercial rights to one’s identity and image have produced a panoply of rulings, exacerbated by a lack of federal law and …


Go To Our Website For More (Of The Same): Reassessing Federal Policy Towards Newspapers Mergers And Cross Media Ownership And The Harm To Localism, Diversity And The Public Interest, Jason Zenor Apr 2012

Go To Our Website For More (Of The Same): Reassessing Federal Policy Towards Newspapers Mergers And Cross Media Ownership And The Harm To Localism, Diversity And The Public Interest, Jason Zenor

Jason Zenor

Newspapers are workhorse of local news industry and this information is important in order to have an informed citizenry. But, the conventional wisdom is that newspapers are an endangered species and that something drastic needs to be done if this form of media is going to survive. Many proactive solutions have been forwarded such as charging for online content, using tablet and smartphone technology to publish newspapers and making newspapers more assessable to younger and more diverse generations. Another more conceding solution is to allow for greater relaxation on newspapers mergers and cross media ownership rules. But, this solution would …


In The United States Talking Out Prevents Acting Out, David D. Butler Mar 2012

In The United States Talking Out Prevents Acting Out, David D. Butler

David D. Butler

No abstract provided.


Bleeeeep! The Regulation Of Indecency, Isolated Nudity And Fleeting Expletives In Broadcast Media - An Uncertain Future For Pacifica V. Fcc, Terri R. Day, Danielle Weatherby Jan 2012

Bleeeeep! The Regulation Of Indecency, Isolated Nudity And Fleeting Expletives In Broadcast Media - An Uncertain Future For Pacifica V. Fcc, Terri R. Day, Danielle Weatherby

Terri R. Day

This article discusses the controversy over the current FCC indecency enforcement regime, an issue the Supreme Court will hear this term. In 2004, the FCC abandoned a thirty year policy of excluding “fleeting expletives” and isolated images of nudity from its indecency enforcement regime. This change, coupled with a 10-fold increase in the statutory maximum fines and a change in assessing penalties on a per-program to a per-broadcast basis, threatens broadcasters with crushing fines for airing one isolated expletive. Since these changes, the FCC has enhanced its enforcement efforts creating a chilling effect on First Amendment protected speech in broadcast …


Bleeeep! The Regulation Of Indecency, Isolated Nudity, And Fleeting Expletives In Broadcast Media - An Uncertain Future For Pacifica V. Fcc, Terri R. Day, Danielle Weatherby Jan 2012

Bleeeep! The Regulation Of Indecency, Isolated Nudity, And Fleeting Expletives In Broadcast Media - An Uncertain Future For Pacifica V. Fcc, Terri R. Day, Danielle Weatherby

Terri R. Day

This article discusses the controversy over the current FCC indecency enforcement regime, an issue the Supreme Court will hear this term. In 2004, the FCC abandoned a thirty year policy of excluding “fleeting expletives” and isolated images of nudity from its indecency enforcement regime. This change, coupled with a 10-fold increase in the statutory maximum fines and a change in assessing penalties on a per-program to a per-broadcast basis, threatens broadcasters with crushing fines for airing one isolated expletive. Since these changes, the FCC has enhanced its enforcement efforts creating a chilling effect on First Amendment protected speech in broadcast …


Bleeeeep! The Regulation Of Indecency, Isolated Nudity, And Fleeting Expletives In Broadcast Media - An Uncertain Future For Pacifica V. Fcc, Terri R. Day, Danielle Weatherby Jan 2012

Bleeeeep! The Regulation Of Indecency, Isolated Nudity, And Fleeting Expletives In Broadcast Media - An Uncertain Future For Pacifica V. Fcc, Terri R. Day, Danielle Weatherby

Terri R. Day

This article discusses the controversy over the current FCC indecency enforcement regime, an issue the Supreme Court will hear this term. In 2004, the FCC abandoned a thirty year policy of excluding “fleeting expletives” and isolated images of nudity from its indecency enforcement regime. This change, coupled with a 10-fold increase in the statutory maximum fines and a change in assessing penalties on a per-program to a per-broadcast basis, threatens broadcasters with crushing fines for airing one isolated expletive. Since these changes, the FCC has enhanced its enforcement efforts creating a chilling effect on First Amendment protected speech in broadcast …


Bleeeeep! The Regulation Of Indecency, Isolated Nudity, And Fleeting Expletives In Broadcast Media: An Uncertain Future For Pacifica V. Fcc, Danielle Weatherby Dec 2011

Bleeeeep! The Regulation Of Indecency, Isolated Nudity, And Fleeting Expletives In Broadcast Media: An Uncertain Future For Pacifica V. Fcc, Danielle Weatherby

Danielle Weatherby

This article posits that regulating in an area of speech that raises questions about its social value and potential harm will be extremely difficult under the Roberts Court. Government restrictions targeting the content of low value, but protected, expression will be reviewed under the exacting standards of core First Amendment speech. Even though the broadcast indecency policy is shrouded in administrative agency deference standards, it is unlikely that the Court will give the FCC free-wheeling reign to enforce its new policy, which is much more speech-restrictive than the FCC’s enforcement policy of the past forty years. While the Court may …


"Put Colloquially, American Law Believes That Talking Out Prevents Acting Out." A First Amendment Primer, David D. Butler Feb 2011

"Put Colloquially, American Law Believes That Talking Out Prevents Acting Out." A First Amendment Primer, David D. Butler

David D. Butler

"Put Colloquially, American Law Believes that Talking Out Prevents Acting Out:" A Free Speech Primer argues that the Federal First Amendment, textually against Congress,and as incorporated by reference against the Several States, states a preference for (1) sanctioning harmful speech or expression in civil proceedings (2) rather than penalizing the speaker or actor in criminal prosecutions. The essay argues that whether in the 1988 theft of an unflattering painting of Chicago Mayor Harold Washington, titled "Mirth and Girth," by three Chicago aldermen from the Chicago Art Institute ranging to then president Clinton's perjury regarding his earlier sexual abuse of an …


Déjà Vu: From Comic Books To Video Games: Legislative Reliance On “Soft Science” To Protect Against Uncertain Societal Harm Linked To Violence V. The First Amendment, Terri R. Day, Ryan C.W. Hall M.D. Sep 2010

Déjà Vu: From Comic Books To Video Games: Legislative Reliance On “Soft Science” To Protect Against Uncertain Societal Harm Linked To Violence V. The First Amendment, Terri R. Day, Ryan C.W. Hall M.D.

Terri R. Day

This article discusses the weaknesses and limitations of social science evidence to prove that the virtual world of violent video games causes any real world harm. The Supreme Court, in its next term, will consider the constitutionality of California’s ban on the sale and rental of violent video games to minors. The controversy on violent video games is the latest legislative attempt to ban access and distribution of violent materials to children, reminiscent of the comic books debate over sixty years ago. This paper goes beyond a discussion of the First Amendment obstacles to violent video game restrictions. It focuses …


Déjà Vu: From Comic Books To Video Games: Legislative Reliance On “Soft Science” To Protect Against Uncertain Societal Harm Linked To Violence V. The First Amendment, Terri R. Day, Ryan Cw Hall M.D. Sep 2010

Déjà Vu: From Comic Books To Video Games: Legislative Reliance On “Soft Science” To Protect Against Uncertain Societal Harm Linked To Violence V. The First Amendment, Terri R. Day, Ryan Cw Hall M.D.

Terri R. Day

This article discusses the weaknesses and limitations of social science evidence to prove that the virtual world of violent video games causes any real world harm. The Supreme Court, in its next term, will consider the constitutionality of California’s ban on the sale and rental of violent video games to minors. The controversy on violent video games is the latest legislative attempt to ban access and distribution of violent materials to children, reminiscent of the comic books debate over sixty years ago. This paper goes beyond a discussion of the First Amendment obstacles to violent video game restrictions. It focuses …


Déjà Vu: From Comic Books To Video Games: Legislative Reliance On “Soft Science” To Protect Against Uncertain Societal Harm Linked To Violence V. The First Amendment, Terri R. Day, Ryan C.W. Hall M.D. Sep 2010

Déjà Vu: From Comic Books To Video Games: Legislative Reliance On “Soft Science” To Protect Against Uncertain Societal Harm Linked To Violence V. The First Amendment, Terri R. Day, Ryan C.W. Hall M.D.

Terri R. Day

This article discusses the weaknesses and limitations of social science evidence to prove that the virtual world of violent video games causes any real world harm. The Supreme Court, in its next term, will consider the constitutionality of California’s ban on the sale and rental of violent video games to minors. The controversy on violent video games is the latest legislative attempt to ban access and distribution of violent materials to children, reminiscent of the comic books debate over sixty years ago. This paper goes beyond a discussion of the First Amendment obstacles to violent video game restrictions. It focuses …


Déjà Vu: From Comic Books To Video Games: Legislative Reliance On “Soft Science” To Protect Against Uncertain Societal Harm Linked To Violence V. The First Amendment, Terri R. Day, Ryan C.W. Hall Dr. Sep 2010

Déjà Vu: From Comic Books To Video Games: Legislative Reliance On “Soft Science” To Protect Against Uncertain Societal Harm Linked To Violence V. The First Amendment, Terri R. Day, Ryan C.W. Hall Dr.

Terri R. Day

This article discusses the weaknesses and limitations of social science evidence to prove that the virtual world of violent video games causes any real world harm. The Supreme Court, in its next term, will consider the constitutionality of California’s ban on the sale and rental of violent video games to minors. The controversy on violent video games is the latest legislative attempt to ban access and distribution of violent materials to children, reminiscent of the comic books debate over sixty years ago. This paper goes beyond a discussion of the First Amendment obstacles to violent video game restrictions. It focuses …


I, Thomas F. Cotter Aug 2009

I, Thomas F. Cotter

Thomas F. Cotter

Many states confer upon natural persons a “right of publicity” that renders unlawful the unauthorized use of a person’s name or other indicia of identity for purposes of trade. Efforts to reconcile publicity rights with the First Amendment and with principles of copyright preemption, however, have differed radically from one state or circuit to another, as well as within the scholarly community. In this Article, we present a comprehensive framework for integrating both First Amendment and copyright preemption principles into standard publicity analysis. Our framework eliminates much of the incoherence found in contemporary right of publicity case law by adopting …


Integrating The Right Of Publicity With First Amendment And Copyright Preemption Analysis, Thomas F. Cotter Aug 2009

Integrating The Right Of Publicity With First Amendment And Copyright Preemption Analysis, Thomas F. Cotter

Thomas F. Cotter

Many states confer upon natural persons a “right of publicity” that renders unlawful the unauthorized use of a person’s name or other indicia of identity for purposes of trade. Efforts to reconcile publicity rights with the First Amendment and with principles of copyright preemption, however, have differed radically from one state or circuit to another, as well as within the scholarly community. In this Article, we present a comprehensive framework for integrating both First Amendment and copyright preemption principles into standard publicity analysis. Our framework eliminates much of the incoherence found in contemporary right of publicity case law by adopting …