Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AZ (1)
- Acre-feet per year (1)
- Afy (1)
- Agricultural (1)
- Ak-Chin (1)
-
- Appropriate (1)
- Authorize (1)
- BIA (1)
- Bureau of Indian Affairs (1)
- CAP (1)
- Canal (1)
- Central Arizona Project (1)
- Cfs (1)
- Colorado River (1)
- Comment (1)
- Contract (1)
- Corporatations (1)
- Cost (1)
- Cubic feet per second (1)
- Damages (1)
- Delegation (1)
- Development (1)
- Disability law (1)
- Economic (1)
- Flood (1)
- Flow (1)
- Force majeure (1)
- Fund (1)
- Grant (1)
- Groundwater (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Water Law - Sporhase V. Nebraska, Mary Ann Green
Water Law - Sporhase V. Nebraska, Mary Ann Green
Natural Resources Journal
No abstract provided.
Natural Resources - Constitutional Law, Celia L. Jorgensen
Natural Resources - Constitutional Law, Celia L. Jorgensen
Natural Resources Journal
No abstract provided.
Environmental Law - Atomic Energy Act, Steven B. Bennett
Environmental Law - Atomic Energy Act, Steven B. Bennett
Natural Resources Journal
No abstract provided.
1983 Agreement In Principle To Revise Ak-Chin Water Settlement, Us Department Of The Interior, Ak-Chin Indian Community
1983 Agreement In Principle To Revise Ak-Chin Water Settlement, Us Department Of The Interior, Ak-Chin Indian Community
Native American Water Rights Settlement Project
Agreement: An Agreement in Principle to Revise Ak-Chin 1978 Water Settlement (Sep. 23, 1983). An agreement for revising water settlement between the Ak-Chin and US to amend the 1978 Act (PL 95-328). The goal of the Agreement is to secure federal legislation to ratify a revised Settlement and provide authorization for appropriations to implement the Settlement. The Agreement provides 15M for an interim water supply replacing an earlier US commitment to develop a well field on nearby federal lands. Ak-Chin alone has the determination and responsibility for the use of these monies. The US will also provide a 3.5M grant …
Mobile Homes?--Public And Private Controls, Robert L. Schwartz
Mobile Homes?--Public And Private Controls, Robert L. Schwartz
Faculty Scholarship
The mobile home of today is a far different creature than that from which it was bred. Changes in size, appearance, safety, convenience, and desirability as a place to live have caused the modem mobile home to bear little resemblance to its ancestors. Functioning as a permanently emplaced dwelling, the mobile home has come to be recognized as undeserving of the label "mobile." Other than by place of manufacture, mobile homes have become increasingly indistinguishable from conventional single family dwellings, raising the question of whether mobile homes can reasonably be restricted from areas reserved for single family dwellings. Land controls, …
Reader Response, Arthur Christian Nelson
Reader Response, Arthur Christian Nelson
Natural Resources Journal
No abstract provided.
The Swank Decision: Economic Interest In Coal Not Dependent On Lease Terminability, Jay Rosenblum
The Swank Decision: Economic Interest In Coal Not Dependent On Lease Terminability, Jay Rosenblum
Natural Resources Journal
No abstract provided.
Memorandum--Pueblo Of Sandia Grant - Eastern Boundary, Sidney L. Mills
Memorandum--Pueblo Of Sandia Grant - Eastern Boundary, Sidney L. Mills
Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim
This memorandum confirms the receipt of the January 1983 report of Ward Alan Minge. The report refers to issues and encroachments regarding the eastern boundary area of Sandia Pueblo. The basic conclusion of Dr. Minge's report is that the Sandia Pueblo Grant, as surveyed under the auspices of the United States in 1859, was of such a nature as to deviate from the Spanish grant documents.
The Alter Ego Doctrine: Alternative Challenges To The Corporate Form, Antoinette M. Sedillo Lopez
The Alter Ego Doctrine: Alternative Challenges To The Corporate Form, Antoinette M. Sedillo Lopez
Faculty Scholarship
This Comment examines alternative challenges to the separate entity fiction. First, it will analyze the economic policies underlying the separate entity concept and the justification for imposing shareholder liability in typical alter ego cases. Second, this Comment will review cases in which the corporate entity is challenged for alternative purposes and demonstrate how the usual alter ego analysis fails in these cases. Finally, this Comment proposes a three-stage analysis for examining alternative challenges to the separate entity fiction. The proposal would require courts to analyze the facts of the cases, identify the policies underlying the challenge, and balance the economic …
Representing Institutionalized Mentally Retarded Persons, James W. Ellis, Ruth A. Luckasson
Representing Institutionalized Mentally Retarded Persons, James W. Ellis, Ruth A. Luckasson
Faculty Scholarship
The following article explores the need for increased legal advocacy for mentally retarded persons. Contrasting the services available to the mentally ill with the limited resources for the mentally retarded, the authors highlight the unique problems of this underrepresented population, and examine alternative forums for advocacy. In a practical, straightforward analysis, the article identifies barriers to effective representation, including the fundamental problem of lawyers' and advocates' reactions to institutionalized retarded persons' appearance and behavior, and the effect of these reactions on advocacy efforts. The article is followed by a client interview form and guide that focus on the special problems …
Institutional Review Of Medical Research: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Risk-Benefit Analysis, And The Possible Effects Of Research On Public Policy, Robert L. Schwartz
Institutional Review Of Medical Research: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Risk-Benefit Analysis, And The Possible Effects Of Research On Public Policy, Robert L. Schwartz
Faculty Scholarship
It is reasonable to expect IRBs to develop and apply policy as other public policy agencies do. In fact, the risk-benefit analysis now required of IRBs appears to be analogous to the cost-benefit analysis adopted by public policy analysts. But, as we shall see, the new risk-benefit criterion is far less comprehensive and valid than the traditional cost-benefit model.