Digital Commons Network^™

Point: The Supreme Court Gets It Right In 303 Creative V. Elenis: People Of Faith Cannot Be Compelled To Create Expressive Messages Violating Their Religious Beliefs, Charles J. Russo

University of Dayton Law Review

No abstract provided.

Search No Further Than Glatt V. Searchlight Pictures For A Uniform Test To The Student-Athlete Employment Question, Gabriella Fletcher

University of Dayton Law Review

No abstract provided.

Religious Freedom In Faith-Based Educational Institutions In The Wake Of 'Obergefell V. Hodges': Believers Beware, Charles J. Russo

Educational Leadership Faculty Publications

Solicitor General Donald Verrilli’s fateful words, uttered in response to a question posed by Justice Samuel Alito during oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges,² likely sent chills up the spines of leaders in faith-based educational institutions, from pre-schools to universities. In Obergefell, a bare majority of the Supreme Court legalized same-sex unions in the United States. Verrilli’s words, combined with the outcome in Obergefell, have a potentially chilling effect on religious freedom. The decision does not only impact educational institutions—the primary focus of this article—but also a wide array of houses of worship. Other religiously affiliated …

Towards Zero Net Presence, Terence Lau

Terence Lau

The rise of social networking has connected us in ways unthinkable a few years ago, but has also raised alarming questions regarding the right to be left alone. More and more, Americans are discovering that information traditionally considered private is moving into the public domain, sometimes with startling implications for their personal lives. Part I of this Article reviews the problem of Internet intrusion into personal privacy. The Internet is especially remarkable for its three central features: reach, speed and permanence. These features make the Internet unlike any other media in existence, and makes protecting privacy extremely difficult. Part II …

The Impact Of The American Doctrine Of Discovery On Native Land Rights In Australia, Canada, And New Zealand, Blake Watson

School of Law Faculty Publications

In Johnson v. McIntosh, John Marshall proclaimed that European discovery of America “gave exclusive title to those who made it . . . .” 21 U.S. 543, 574 (1823). Marshall presented a revised version of the discovery doctrine in Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), yet it is Johnson that remains the leading decision on native property rights in the United States. The Johnson discovery rule has not only diminished native rights in the United States, but has also influenced the definition of indigenous land rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.

This Article sheds light on …

Same-Sex Marriage And Public School Curricula: Preserving Parental Rights To Direct The Education Of Their Children, Charles J. Russo

University of Dayton Law Review

No abstract provided.

Same-Sex Marriage And Public School Curricula: Preserving Parental Rights To Direct The Education Of Their Children, Charles J. Russo

Educational Leadership Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Equality: A Comparison Of Three Countries, Ronald C. Griffin

University of Dayton Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Christian Theology For Roman Catholic Law Schools, Thomas L. Shaffer, Robert E. Rodes Jr.

University of Dayton Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nativism And Nonpreferentialism: A Historical Critique Of The Current Church And State Theme, Stephen C. Veltri

University of Dayton Law Review

No abstract provided.