Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 10 of 10

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Safeway Stores V. Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1953

Safeway Stores V. Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Under state law, the clerks' unions did not have the right to engage in concerted activities against a store for the purpose of requiring store managers to be included in the labor contract of the clerks.


Martin V. Henderson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Apr 1953

Martin V. Henderson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Officers were not entitled to compensation for overtime worked prior to the enactment of the California State Civil Service Act provision for overtime compensation, but were entitled to compensation for overtime after the statute's effective date.


. Jarvis V. Henderson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Apr 1953

. Jarvis V. Henderson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Statutes authorizing the payment to civil service employees upon separation of accumulated overtime and payment for holiday work would not be applied retroactively; absent statutory authority, a highway patrol officer had no right to such payments.


Voeltz V. Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1953

Voeltz V. Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Enjoining unions from interfering with an employer's business was proper when the employer's workers organized their own association and asked the unions to stop their activity.


Rubin V. American Sportsmen Television Equity Soc. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1953

Rubin V. American Sportsmen Television Equity Soc. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Promoters were entitled to preliminary injunctions to prevent a corporation and individual wrestlers from picketing where the corporation was not a bona fide labor organization, and the individual wrestlers' labor activities were not protected.


Sommer V. Metal Trades Council [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1953

Sommer V. Metal Trades Council [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Because federal law did not protect a union's picketing and a secondary boycott that it originated, a California trial court had the power under the Jurisdictional Strike Act of California to preliminarily enjoin the union's activities.


Isthmian S.S. Co. V. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Asso. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1953

Isthmian S.S. Co. V. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Asso. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A preliminary injunction enjoining picketing was proper where the case was not necessarily close on its facts when the evidence most favorable to the party granted the injunction was reviewed, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion.


Isthmian S.S. Co. V. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Asso. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1953

Isthmian S.S. Co. V. National Marine Engineers Beneficial Asso. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A preliminary injunction enjoining picketing was proper where the case was not necessarily close on its facts when the evidence most favorable to the party granted the injunction was reviewed, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion.


In Re Kelleher [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1953

In Re Kelleher [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

It was unlawful for two labor unions that were involved in a controversy as to which one should represent the employees to picket outside of the employer, so the picketers were lawfully arrested and their writs of habeas corpus were denied.


Seven Up Bottling Co. V. Grocery Drivers Union, Jesse W. Carter Mar 1953

Seven Up Bottling Co. V. Grocery Drivers Union, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

California's Jurisdictional Strike Act, which banned interference with an employer and picketing when there was a dispute between two unions as to who should have bargaining rights, did not violate unions' free speech rights.