Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Children (2)
- Administration of Juvenile Justice (1)
- Age of Consent (1)
- Basic Education Act (1)
- Best interest (1)
-
- Due Process of Law (1)
- Education Programs for Juvenile Inmates (1)
- Education law (1)
- Incarcerated youth (1)
- Inmate education (1)
- Juvenile Inmates Act (1)
- Juvenile delinquents--Sentencing--Minnesota (1)
- Juvenile inmate education (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Prisons (1)
- Punishment (1)
- RCW section 28A.193 (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Revocation of probation--Minnesota (1)
- Right to Trial by Jury (1)
- Standard of review (Law)--Minnesota (1)
- Teenage Sexual Behavior (1)
- Title IX (1)
- Tunstall v. Bergeson (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Justice By Any Other Name: The Right To A Jury Trial And The Criminal Nature Of Juvenile Justice In Louisiana, Kerrin C. Wolf
Justice By Any Other Name: The Right To A Jury Trial And The Criminal Nature Of Juvenile Justice In Louisiana, Kerrin C. Wolf
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The juvenile justice system has become increasingly punitive in recent decades. While the juvenile justice system has come to resemble the adult system in this way, juveniles facing adjudication nevertheless are denied the essential Sixth Amendment due process right. This Note will argue that the Louisiana Supreme Court decided State ex rel. D.J. incorrectly and, further, will demonstrate that the nation as a whole should revisit the place of juries in juvenile proceedings.
From Jailbird To Jailbait: Age Of Consent Law And The Construction Of Teenage Sexualities, Kate Sutherland
From Jailbird To Jailbait: Age Of Consent Law And The Construction Of Teenage Sexualities, Kate Sutherland
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Waiving Goodbye: Incarcerating Waived Juveniles In Adult Correctional Facilities Will Not Reduce Crime, Ellie D. Shefi
Waiving Goodbye: Incarcerating Waived Juveniles In Adult Correctional Facilities Will Not Reduce Crime, Ellie D. Shefi
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Incarcerating waived juveniles in adult correctional facilities does not reduce crime or result in increased public safety; incarcerating juveniles with adults is deleterious to both the individual offender and society. This Note argues for a renewed focus on rehabilitative rather than retributive justice, and in so doing, proposes the implementation of a comprehensive continuum of graduated sanctions that includes networks of small, secure, highly structured maximum-security juvenile facilities, wilderness camps, residential and non-residential community-based programs, restitution, and fines. This Note further advocates for the incorporation of extensive education, vocational training and placement, counseling, treatment, supervision, mentoring, transitional, aftercare, and support …
Comparing Children To The Mentally Retarded: How The Decision In Atkins V. Virginia Will Affect The Execution Of Jevenile Offenders , Robin M. A. Weeks
Comparing Children To The Mentally Retarded: How The Decision In Atkins V. Virginia Will Affect The Execution Of Jevenile Offenders , Robin M. A. Weeks
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Best Interests Equals Zealous Advocacy: A Not So Radical View Of Holistic Representation For Children Accused Of Crime, Ellen Marrus
Best Interests Equals Zealous Advocacy: A Not So Radical View Of Holistic Representation For Children Accused Of Crime, Ellen Marrus
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Quandary Of Megan's Law: When The Child Sex Offender Is A Child, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 73 (2003), Timothy E. Wind
The Quandary Of Megan's Law: When The Child Sex Offender Is A Child, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 73 (2003), Timothy E. Wind
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Juvenile Law Developments—“One Last Chance”: Applying Adult Standards To Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile Proceedings—State V. B.Y., Kathryn A. Santelmann, Kara Rafferty
Juvenile Law Developments—“One Last Chance”: Applying Adult Standards To Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile Proceedings—State V. B.Y., Kathryn A. Santelmann, Kara Rafferty
William Mitchell Law Review
In 1995, Minnesota created a blended sentencing option for serious, violent juvenile offenders. Under this new option, Extended Juvenile Jurisdiction (“EJJ”), the juvenile court retains jurisdiction over the offender until age 21. In EJJ cases the court also imposes an adult sentence, which is stayed on the condition that the offender complies with the conditions of probation. Since the passage of the EJJ statute, the Minnesota Supreme Court has issued a limited number of opinions reviewing EJJ cases. State v. B.Y., issued April 24, 2003, involves an issue of first impression. The B.Y. opinion addresses standards to be applied in …
Depriving Washington State's Incarcerated Youth Of An Education: The Debilitating Effects Of Tunstall V. Bergeson, Jamie Polito Johnston
Depriving Washington State's Incarcerated Youth Of An Education: The Debilitating Effects Of Tunstall V. Bergeson, Jamie Polito Johnston
Seattle University Law Review
The analysis begins in Section II with a general overview and summary of Tunstall v. Bergeson. Section III presents a brief legislative background of the statute at issue in Tunstall, Education Programs for Juvenile Inmates, RCW section 28A.193. Section IV discusses Tunstall's misinterpretation of these statutory provisions, demonstrating the Education Programs for Juvenile Inmates' disregard of the paramount duty to provide education to youth under twenty-one pursuant to the Basic Education Act and violation of the Washington Constitution, as discussed in Section V. Next, Section VI argues that because the right to education is a fundamental right under state law, …