Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Juveniles (3)
- Children (1)
- Children's welfare (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Competency litigation (1)
-
- Competency to Stand Trial (1)
- Competency to stand trial (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Datos empíricos (1)
- Dependency (1)
- Domestic violence (1)
- Empirical Legal Research (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Immigration law (1)
- Justicia penal adolescente (1)
- Juvenile competency adjudication (1)
- Juvenile sentencing (1)
- Kids are different (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Ley N° 20.084 (1)
- Line of cases (1)
- Miller v. alabama (1)
- Participant observation (1)
- Privación de libertad (1)
- Professional Ethics (1)
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Reforma A La Justicia Penal Juvenil Y Adolescentes Privados De Libertad En Chile: Aportes Empíricos Para El Debate, Ricardo Lillo, Maximo Langer
Reforma A La Justicia Penal Juvenil Y Adolescentes Privados De Libertad En Chile: Aportes Empíricos Para El Debate, Ricardo Lillo, Maximo Langer
Ricardo Lillo
Este artículo tiene por objeto brindar y analizar algunos datos empíricos sobre el funcionamiento de la Justicia Penal Adolescente luego de siete años de la entrada en vigencia de la Ley N° 20.084. Uno de los objetivos de esta reforma fue adecuar la legislación en la materia a los estándares del Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, entre los cuales se encuentran el criterio de intervención penal especial reducida o moderada y la utilización de la privación de libertad como medida de ultima ratio. Nuestros datos indican que con posterioridad a su entrada en vigencia han aumentado tanto el número …
Juvenile Competency Adjudication In California Criminal Court, Michael W. Hanley
Juvenile Competency Adjudication In California Criminal Court, Michael W. Hanley
Michael W Hanley
Legal issues are examined vis-à-vis an empirical case study of a criminal judicial proceeding where an alleged juvenile offender was charged with serious crimes in an adult court venue. The issue litigated before a 12-member jury was not the substantive merits of guilt or innocence of the alleged criminal conduct, but whether the juvenile offender was statutorily and constitutionally competent to stand trial. The following is a succinct account of the procedural and substantive constitutional and statutory rules attributed to legal competency to stand trial and how they were recognized and applied in the government’s case against an alleged juvenile …
Departing From Teague: Miller V. Alabama's Invitation To The States To Experiment With New Retroactivity Standards, Eric Schab
Eric Schab
No abstract provided.
The Ethics Of Effective Advocacy For Children In Abuse And Neglect Proceedings, Suparna Malempati
The Ethics Of Effective Advocacy For Children In Abuse And Neglect Proceedings, Suparna Malempati
Suparna Malempati
This article addresses ethical dilemmas lawyers face when representing children in abuse and neglect proceedings in juvenile court. Children in such cases need traditional advocacy in order to protect their legal rights and effectuate just outcomes. Lawyers who represent children have an ethical obligation to perform this function as advocates for their clients and not merely as guardians ad litem who make paternalistic recommendations about the best interests of children. The requirement that lawyers disregard their role as advocates for the role of guardians ad litem circumvents the ethical rules that govern lawyers and fails to adequately and effectively safeguard …
Denying Freedom Rather Than Securing The Country: National Security Is Undermined By Laws Governing Battered Immigrants, Eve Tilley-Coulson
Denying Freedom Rather Than Securing The Country: National Security Is Undermined By Laws Governing Battered Immigrants, Eve Tilley-Coulson
Eve Tilley-Coulson
Relief for battered immigrants is not an obvious national security matter per se, yet remedies are enacted in conjunction with stringent interpretations of immigration law, as though victims pose a security threat. Discrepancies exist between the immigration laws themselves—which attempt to secure the United States from disease, violence, and illegal activity—and the loopholes found within remedies under these laws, unnecessarily removing victims and perpetuating a cycle of fear and abuse. This paper addresses how relief for battered immigrants, when implemented with the priority of protecting national security and immigration legislation, creates and perpetuates negative societal consequences. The economic and societal …