Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (878)
- Selected Works (823)
- SelectedWorks (372)
- University of Michigan Law School (360)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (332)
-
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (300)
- UIC School of Law (290)
- University of New Mexico (255)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (209)
- University of Colorado Law School (203)
- Seattle University School of Law (201)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (200)
- Georgetown University Law Center (194)
- BLR (175)
- Barry University School of Law (166)
- Pepperdine University (162)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (154)
- American University Washington College of Law (143)
- Notre Dame Law School (133)
- United Arab Emirates University (132)
- Universitas Indonesia (126)
- University of Georgia School of Law (121)
- New York Law School (102)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (102)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (97)
- Cornell University Law School (93)
- University of Miami Law School (90)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (89)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (88)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (87)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (1403)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (394)
- Constitutional Law (254)
- Supreme Court (254)
-
- Constitutional law (232)
- Constitution (201)
- Law and Society (197)
- United States Supreme Court (189)
- Judges (182)
- Law (176)
- Courts (165)
- Judicial review (132)
- Legal History (126)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (120)
- First Amendment (118)
- Legal theory (112)
- Legislation (108)
- Law and Economics (106)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (104)
- Justice (103)
- Politics (101)
- International Law (94)
- Religion (92)
- Criminal law (90)
- International law (89)
- Statutory interpretation (89)
- Inc. (88)
- Due process (84)
- Evidence (79)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (856)
- All Faculty Scholarship (377)
- Faculty Scholarship (317)
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association (289)
- UIC Law Review (277)
-
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (253)
- Michigan Law Review (234)
- Articles (229)
- Publications (196)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (188)
- Seattle University Law Review (188)
- ExpressO (170)
- Touro Law Review (170)
- Scholarly Works (133)
- UAEU Law Journal (132)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Paulo Ferreira da Cunha (111)
- Barry Law Review (109)
- Journal Articles (109)
- Indiana Law Journal (106)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (93)
- Faculty Publications (88)
- Pepperdine Law Review (83)
- Akron Law Review (79)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (74)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (73)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (70)
- Law Faculty Publications (61)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (59)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (58)
Articles 1 - 30 of 9124
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Antitrust Jurisprudence Of Neil Gorsuch, John M. Newman
The Antitrust Jurisprudence Of Neil Gorsuch, John M. Newman
Florida State University Law Review
In 2017, the U.S. Senate confirmed Neil M. Gorsuch’s nomination to serve on the Supreme Court. Like Justice Stevens before him, Gorsuch’s primary area of expertise is anti-trust law. Like Stevens, Gorsuch both practiced and taught in the field before joining the bench. As a judge for the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Gorsuch penned multiple substantive antitrust opinions.
His unique expertise will likely situate Gorsuch as one of the Court’s leading voices on antitrust matters for decades to come. A close examination of his prior antitrust opinions thus offers vital insight into his approach to antitrust principles and execution. …
Killers That Once Were Humans: Reading The Role Of Modern Law Via Instrumental Rationality, Momen Abdelbari Hassan
Killers That Once Were Humans: Reading The Role Of Modern Law Via Instrumental Rationality, Momen Abdelbari Hassan
Theses and Dissertations
For Max Weber, the process of modernization is the process of rationalization in which it includes every realm in our modern life, such as the economy, science, organization, education, and law. However, this kind of rationalization has created coercive and inhumane conditions because rationalization has converted to being instrumental (value-free) without regard to any transcendental or moral values. The inhumane paradigm has become the only fate of our world. The vision needs rational domination to be achieved through formal rational law. Modern law, along with bureaucratization, has paved the road to rational political domination. This kind of domination captures human …
Legal Summaries Of Administrative Law Cases, Keyana Young
Legal Summaries Of Administrative Law Cases, Keyana Young
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Egypt’S Legal Modernism: Challenging The National Discourse, Mohamed A. El-Deeb
Egypt’S Legal Modernism: Challenging The National Discourse, Mohamed A. El-Deeb
Theses and Dissertations
Egypt’s legal modernity is the story of the modern Egyptian state itself. Reforming the country’s judiciary in the late nineteenth century was meant to achieve ambitious aims beyond the functionality of a justice system. The utmost goal was the country’s independence from the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire. The judicial reforms modernized the Egyptian state and built a judiciary and legal community like no other place. Egypt achieved its independent judiciary before gaining its political independence. That was a remarkable achievement of the judicial reform. That rich part of Egypt’s modern history is negated and disregarded from public awareness. Not …
Locke’S “Wild Indian” In United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence, Anthony W. Hobert Phd
Locke’S “Wild Indian” In United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence, Anthony W. Hobert Phd
American Indian Law Journal
This article explores the impact of John Locke’s Two Treatises on United States Indigenous property rights jurisprudence. After discussing Locke’s arguments, the article turns to the rationales of the first and last cases of the Marshall Trilogy—Johnson v. McIntosh (1823) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832)—arguing that, contrary to prevailing political theory, Marshall’s opinion for the Court in Johnson puts forth a fundamentally Lockean justification for the dispossession of Indigenous property. This article also provides a brief analysis of Marshall’s explicit Vattelian rationale in Worcester, commentary on recent developments regarding the precedents, and recommendations for reconciling them within contemporary …
The Validity And Criticisms Of The Current Approach Of Human Rights Bodies Regarding The Positive Procedural Obligations Of States, Faris Kareem Al-Anaibi Dr.
The Validity And Criticisms Of The Current Approach Of Human Rights Bodies Regarding The Positive Procedural Obligations Of States, Faris Kareem Al-Anaibi Dr.
UAEU Law Journal
This paper questions whether the current approach of human rights bodies with regard to the positive procedural obligations is valid according to both, the domestic legal standards of states, and the mandate given to them in the conventions. It raises important criticisms about the capability of human rights bodies to effectively fulfill their newly assumed task of ordering and supervising prosecutions and punishments in criminal matters. It seems clear that the domestic justice systems of states bear the primary responsibility to bring violators of the right to life and other human rights to justice and action by human rights bodies …
Titrisation Et «Sukukisation» En Droit Tunisien, Nizar Hamrouni Dr.
Titrisation Et «Sukukisation» En Droit Tunisien, Nizar Hamrouni Dr.
UAEU Law Journal
Banks and financial institutions sometimes have to invest the debts they owe to others because they need money by transferring them to others through many means, the most important of which is securitization, which is the transfer of debts to a mutual debt fund in exchange for tradable securities in the market. However, securitization in this commercial form led to the transfer of debt-related risks to the financial market, which actually caused the global financial crisis of 2008.
Therefore, sukuk represents the Islamic alternative to securitization in terms of its subjection to Islamic controls, the most important of which is …
The Fine For The Crime Of Issuing A Cheque Without A Balance Between The Ordinary And The Relative In The Algerian Legislation, Bassim Chihab Prof.
The Fine For The Crime Of Issuing A Cheque Without A Balance Between The Ordinary And The Relative In The Algerian Legislation, Bassim Chihab Prof.
UAEU Law Journal
The fine stipulated in Article 374 of the Algerian Penal Code took a special place in both the judiciary and legal jurisprudence, as the legislator made it specific to the value of the cheque or the decrease in the balance. The judiciary described it as a mandatory complementary punishment, and this resulted in important consequences, as it is not valid to rule on it alone, reprieve or reduce it. In view of the developments in the punitive policy, the Algerian judiciary, represented by the Supreme Court, considered this fine as an original penalty, and everything related to this description was …
Era Of Confusion: The State Of Patent Eligibility Jurisprudence And The Need For Intervention, Alyssa Boggs
Era Of Confusion: The State Of Patent Eligibility Jurisprudence And The Need For Intervention, Alyssa Boggs
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Poor Man's Problem In Bankruptcy, Rylee Stanley
The Poor Man's Problem In Bankruptcy, Rylee Stanley
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Rights And Retrenchment: The Elusive Promise Of Equal Citizenship, Deborah L. Brake
Constitutional Rights And Retrenchment: The Elusive Promise Of Equal Citizenship, Deborah L. Brake
University of Cincinnati Law Review
No abstract provided.
Resurrection, Bassim Al Shaker
Resurrection, Bassim Al Shaker
Northwestern Law Journal des Refusés
No abstract provided.
Self-Evident: Why The Declaration Of Independence Is America’S True Constitution, Chelsea H. Blake
Self-Evident: Why The Declaration Of Independence Is America’S True Constitution, Chelsea H. Blake
Northwestern Law Journal des Refusés
No abstract provided.
American Legal Realism Today: An Idiosyncratic Restatement, Mark Tushnet
American Legal Realism Today: An Idiosyncratic Restatement, Mark Tushnet
Northwestern Law Journal des Refusés
No abstract provided.
An Introduction To American Legal Realism, Noah Hornberger
An Introduction To American Legal Realism, Noah Hornberger
Northwestern Law Journal des Refusés
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Caroline Faye Radell, Udhanth Mallasani
Foreword, Caroline Faye Radell, Udhanth Mallasani
Northwestern Law Journal des Refusés
No abstract provided.
Decoding Dobbs: A Typology To Better Understand The Roberts Court's Jurisprudence, Katie Yoder
Decoding Dobbs: A Typology To Better Understand The Roberts Court's Jurisprudence, Katie Yoder
Honors Projects
The U.S. Supreme Court first recognized Substantive Due Process (“SDP”) in the early twentieth century. In Lochner v. New York, the Court established that there are certain unenumerated rights that are implied by the Fourteenth Amendment.Though SDP originated in a case about worker’s rights and liberties, it quickly became relevant to many cases surrounding personal intimate decisions involving health, safety, marriage, sexual activity, and reproduction.Over the past 60 years, the Court relied upon SDP to justify expanding a fundamental right to privacy, liberty, and the right to medical decision making. Specifically, the court applied these concepts to allow for freedoms …
Agency Deference After Loper: Expertise As A Casualty Of A War Against The “Administrative State”, Michael M. Epstein
Agency Deference After Loper: Expertise As A Casualty Of A War Against The “Administrative State”, Michael M. Epstein
Brooklyn Law Review
Chevron deference has been a foundational principle for administrative law for decades. Chevron provided a two-step analysis for determining whether an agency would be given deference in its decision-making. This deferential test finds its legitimacy on the grounds of agency expertise and accountability. However, when the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprise v. Raimondo, it positioned itself to potentially overrule or severely limit Chevron. An overruling of Chevron would place judicial deference to administrative agency decisions in peril by allowing courts to substitute their own views over the informed opinions of agency experts. This …
Nationwide Injunctions And The Administrative State, Russell L. Weaver
Nationwide Injunctions And The Administrative State, Russell L. Weaver
Brooklyn Law Review
Where an administrative regulation is deemed by a court to be illegal, unconstitutional, or otherwise invalid, courts sometimes issue nationwide injunctions. In other words, instead of holding that the regulation cannot be applied to the individuals before the court, the court prohibits the agency from applying the regulation anywhere in the country, including to others not before the court. This article explores the debate surrounding the appropriateness of nationwide injunctions. While at first glance such injunctions may seem to make sense, they can have serious consequences, including risk of abuse and forum shopping, amplification of erroneous decisions, and the negative …
When Life Takes Your Lemons: Resolving The Legislative Prayer Debate In School Board Settings In Light Of Kennedy V. Bremerton School District, Jordan Halper
Brooklyn Law Review
The COVID-19 pandemic fanned the flames of a fire that had been slowly but steadily burning since 2016, arming the loudest warriors of America’s endless culture war with a slew of new divisive issues. Virtually overnight, parental rights groups began capitalizing on the frustration in their communities in order to spur political change, training their ire toward public schools. What began as a crusade against mask mandates and vaccines manifested into a well-funded effort by ultraconservative groups to undermine the public education system as a whole. Against this backdrop, the legislative prayer exception—which was meant to sanction the practice of …
The Major Questions Doctrine’S Domain, Todd Phillips, Beau J. Baumann
The Major Questions Doctrine’S Domain, Todd Phillips, Beau J. Baumann
Brooklyn Law Review
In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court elevated the major questions doctrine to new heights by reframing it as a substantive canon and clear statement rule rooted in the separation of powers. The academic response has missed two unanswered questions that will determine the extent of the doctrine’s domain. First, how will the Court apply the doctrine to a range of different regulatory schemes? The doctrine has so far only been applied to nationwide legislative rules that are both (1) economically or politically significant and (2) transformative. It is unclear whether the doctrine applies to alternative modes of regulation …
Silencing And Surveillance: The Struggle Of Same-Sex Desire In The Shadow Of The 20th-Century Police State, Ethan Dunn
Silencing And Surveillance: The Struggle Of Same-Sex Desire In The Shadow Of The 20th-Century Police State, Ethan Dunn
Honors Theses
This paper investigates the intersection of social perceptions of vice and gender norms in shaping the policing of sexual orientation and sexuality during the turn of the twentieth century. Employing a legal analysis rooted in the law and society movement and critical legal studies, this study examines how social anxieties surrounding vice and vice crimes prompted swift legislative measures at both federal and state levels, resulting in statutes characterized by broad language that granted extensive discretion to law enforcement officials and judges. The emergence of morals and vice police squads further intensified the targeting of individuals who deviated from prevailing …
Interpretive Divergence In The New York Court Of Appeals, Ethan J. Leib
Interpretive Divergence In The New York Court Of Appeals, Ethan J. Leib
Journal of Legislation
This Article focuses attention on the New York Court of Appeals, which is decidedly formalist about contract interpretation but decidedly contextualist about statutory interpretation. It explores some recent exemplary cases to show where the New York Court of Appeals tends to land in what turns out to be, for this court at least, two different battlefields in the law of interpretation. Finding that there is “interpretive divergence” between statutory and contract cases, the Article then reflects on the practice of divergence more generally, revisiting assumptions about why anyone might have thought harmonization was sensible in the first place.
The Mosaic Theory In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence: The Last Bastion Of Privacy In A Camera-Surveilled World, Auggie Alvarado
The Mosaic Theory In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence: The Last Bastion Of Privacy In A Camera-Surveilled World, Auggie Alvarado
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
How Close Is Close Enough: A Step-By-Step Analysis To Resolve The Circuit Split Created By Misunderstanding The Spokeo Ruling, Cason Shipp
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Defiance, Lackland H. Bloom Jr
Rethinking Legislative Facts, Haley N. Proctor
Rethinking Legislative Facts, Haley N. Proctor
Notre Dame Law Review
As the factual nature of legal inquiry has become increasingly apparent over the past century, courts and commentators have fallen into the habit of labeling the facts behind the law “legislative facts.” Loosely, legislative facts are general facts courts rely upon to formulate law or policy, but that definition is as contested as it is vague. Most agree that legislative facts exist in some form or another, but few agree on what that form is, on who should find them, and how. This Article seeks to account for and resolve that confusion. Theories of legislative fact focus on the role …
Who Is A Minister? Originalist Deference Expands The Ministerial Exception, Jared C. Huber
Who Is A Minister? Originalist Deference Expands The Ministerial Exception, Jared C. Huber
Notre Dame Law Review
The ministerial exception is a doctrine born out of the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment that shields many religious institutions’ employment decisions from review. While the ministerial exception does not extend to all employment decisions by, or employees of, religious institutions, it does confer broad—and absolute—protection. While less controversy surrounds whether the Constitution shields religious institutions’ employment decisions to at least some extent, much more debate surrounds the exception’s scope, and perhaps most critically, which employees fall under it. In other words, who is a "minister" for purposes of the ministerial exception?
Proportionalities, Youngjae Lee
Proportionalities, Youngjae Lee
Notre Dame Law Review Reflection
“Proportionality” is ubiquitous. The idea that punishment should be proportional to crime is familiar in criminal law and has a lengthy history. But that is not the only place where one encounters the concept of proportionality in law and ethics. The idea of proportionality is important also in the self-defense context, where the right to defend oneself with force is limited by the principle of proportionality. Proportionality plays a role in the context of war, especially in the idea that the military advantage one side may draw from an attack must not be excessive in relation to the loss of …
Existing Challenges And Possible Pathways For Case Success In Climate Litigation With Human Rights Claims, Daniel Ziebarth
Existing Challenges And Possible Pathways For Case Success In Climate Litigation With Human Rights Claims, Daniel Ziebarth
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.