Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Constitution Of The People: Frederick Douglass And The Dred Scott Decision, Robert Bernasconi
The Constitution Of The People: Frederick Douglass And The Dred Scott Decision, Robert Bernasconi
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nationwide Service Of Process In State Courts, David Carlebach
Nationwide Service Of Process In State Courts, David Carlebach
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss
Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
My Pizza With Ninó, Alex Kozinski
Bringing Meaning To Interest Balancing In Transnational Litigation, Spencer W. Waller
Bringing Meaning To Interest Balancing In Transnational Litigation, Spencer W. Waller
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article contends that the current state of the debate over the balancing of interests in the extraterritorial application of United States law is outmoded and in need of serious reexamination. Most commentators and scholars continue to focus on the area of jurisdiction to prescribe, the acceptability of the effects test, and the development of lists of United States and foreign interests to be balanced by a United States court before exercising jurisdiction.
Professor Waller contends that this debate is no longer productive. Extraterritoriality, with some limitations for the interests of other states, is an accepted feature of United States …
Finding Harmony Amidst Disagreement Over Extradition, Jurisdiction, The Role Of Human Rights, And Issues Of Extraterritoriality Under International Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley, Otto Lagodny
Finding Harmony Amidst Disagreement Over Extradition, Jurisdiction, The Role Of Human Rights, And Issues Of Extraterritoriality Under International Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley, Otto Lagodny
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article examines extradition and jurisdiction over extraterritorial crime, focusing on the relationship between jurisdiction and extradition in the broader context of human rights law. The authors challenge what they argue are chimerical, although strongly held beliefs in the incompatibility of European and United States criminal justice systems and extradition practices. They argue that cooperation in matters of international criminal law may be enhanced, while protection of human rights is promoted. The authors establish this possibility by breaking down the barriers to understanding that stem from the divergent European versus Anglo-American modes of analysis.
Comptroller And Attorney-General
Jurisdiction: Burnham V. Superior Court: Adding Confusion To Transient Jurisdiction, Armand Paliotta
Jurisdiction: Burnham V. Superior Court: Adding Confusion To Transient Jurisdiction, Armand Paliotta
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.