Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abuse of law (1)
- Aggression (1)
- Article 27(3) of the UN Charter (1)
- CHIPS Act (1)
- Good faith (1)
-
- Inflation Reduction Act (1)
- International institutions (1)
- International organization status (1)
- Jus cogens (1)
- Nonstandard international organizations (1)
- OECD BEPS 2.0 (1)
- OECD Pillar Two (1)
- Paradigmatic networks (1)
- Right to life (1)
- UN Security Council (1)
- Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) (1)
- Veto (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The War In Ukraine And Legal Limitations On Russian Vetoes, Anne Peters
The War In Ukraine And Legal Limitations On Russian Vetoes, Anne Peters
Articles
A veto exercised by a permanent member of the UN Security Council to shield that state’s own manifest and prima facie aggression from condemnation and collective action by the Council is legally flawed. The UN Charter can be reasonably interpreted as prohibiting such a veto and depriving it of legal force. This flows from Article 27(3) of the Charter, in conjunction with the prohibition of the abuse of rights, as a manifestation of the principle of good faith, and the obligation to respect the right to life, against the background that the prohibition has the status of jus cogens. These …
Back To Basics: The Benefits Of Paradigmatic International Organizations, Kristina Daugirdas, Katerina Linos
Back To Basics: The Benefits Of Paradigmatic International Organizations, Kristina Daugirdas, Katerina Linos
Articles
In the early 2000s, small “coalitions of the willing,” flexible networks, and nimble private-public partnerships were promoted as alternatives to bureaucratic, consensus-seeking, and slow-moving international organizations. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria was established as an efficient alternative to the lumbering World Health Organization. The Basel Committee, the Financial Stability Forum, and the Financial Action Task Force were lauded as global market regulators. The Pompidou Group, the Dublin Group, and Interpol were touted as effective police networks in the battle against transnational crime.
We systematically reviewed the evolution of these celebrated networks in the ensuing decades by …
Pillar 2 And The Credits., Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
Pillar 2 And The Credits., Reuven S. Avi-Yonah
Articles
The international tax provisions of the Build Back Better Act (BBB) passed by the House of Representatives represent a reasonable compromise. They are consistent with the OECD’s Pillar Two statement, and they represent a significant move toward the implementation of the single tax principle (STP). In what follows, we will discuss the proposed changes and how they fit in with the new international tax regime (ITR). We will also address the possible interactions with the ITR if BBB is not enacted.