Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Background Note: Standard Essential Patents, Innovation And Competition: Challenges In India, Arpan Banerjee
Background Note: Standard Essential Patents, Innovation And Competition: Challenges In India, Arpan Banerjee
IP Theory
In September 2014, a few months after a landslide election victory, the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the launch of “Make in India,” an ambitious program designed to turn India into a global manufacturing hub. One of the factors widely thought to be responsible for Modi’s victory was support from India’s “neo-middle class”—a young, newly- urbanized section of the electorate seeking employment and improved living standards but struggling amidst an economic downturn. In a speech inaugurating Make in India, Modi linked the program with the aspirations of this section of society. Modi stated the need to elevate the status …
Road Map To Revolution? Patent-Based Open Science, Lee Petherbridge
Road Map To Revolution? Patent-Based Open Science, Lee Petherbridge
Maine Law Review
The contemporary approach to innovation in the life sciences relies on a patent-based proprietary model. Limitations on patent rights and business concerns often focus innovation to markets where the near-term monetary rewards are highest. This is “efficient” under an austere understanding of the term, but the proprietary model can be problematic from a practical perspective because it may not focus innovation to certain deserving markets. This Article contends that the property rights conferred by patent law may still serve as a positive base for innovation directed to underserved markets. The comparatively strong rights conferred by patent law provide upstream or …
Connect The Dots: Patents And Interdisciplinarity, Michal Shur-Ofry
Connect The Dots: Patents And Interdisciplinarity, Michal Shur-Ofry
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article unravels a troubling paradox in the ecosystem of innovation. Interdisciplinarity is widely recognized as a source of valuable innovation and a trigger for technological breakthroughs. Yet, patent law, a principal legal tool for promoting innovation, fails to acknowledge it in an explicit, consistent manner. Moreover, although the scientific understanding of the significance of interdisciplinarity for innovation increasingly relies on big data analyses of patent databases, patent law practically ignores patent data as a source of information about interdisciplinary innovation. This Article argues that patent law should connect the dots—explicitly recognize interdisciplinarity as a positive indication when deciding whether …
Reconsidering Experimental Use, Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss
Reconsidering Experimental Use, Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss
Akron Law Review
In the years since the Supreme Court began to narrow the scope of patentable subject matter, uncertainties in the law have had a deleterious impact on several important innovation sectors, including, in particular, the life sciences industry. There are now initiatives to expand patentable subject matter legislatively. In this article, I suggest that the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence is an outgrowth of the concern that patents on fundamental discoveries impede scientific research. To deal with that issue, any measure to expand the subject matter of patenting should be coupled with a parallel expansion of defenses to infringement liability, including the restoration …
Using Signal Theory To Determine Nonobviousness Of Inventions, Michael O'Brien, Idonah Molina
Using Signal Theory To Determine Nonobviousness Of Inventions, Michael O'Brien, Idonah Molina
Journal of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.