Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (2)
- Press Clause (2)
- AHRC (1)
- ASIO (1)
- Abrams v. United States (1)
-
- Anti-Semitism (1)
- Australian Human Rights Commission (1)
- Australian Law Reform Commission report on Multiculturalism and the Law (1)
- Australian Security Intelligence Organization (1)
- Australian criminal law (1)
- Barry O’Farrell (1)
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Commonwealth racial vilification laws (1)
- Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (1)
- Crimes Act 1900 (1)
- Cross burning (1)
- Dangers (1)
- Drone Journalism (1)
- ECAJ (1)
- Executive Council of Australian Jewry (1)
- Federal Directives (1)
- Federal Magistrates Court (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of expression (1)
- Gail Mason (1)
- General Limitation Clause (1)
- High Court of Australia (1)
- ICCPR (1)
- ICERD (1)
- ICERD Committee (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
You Have The Right To Free Speech: Retaliatory Arrests And The Pretext Of Probable Cause, Katherine G. Howard
You Have The Right To Free Speech: Retaliatory Arrests And The Pretext Of Probable Cause, Katherine G. Howard
Georgia Law Review
An important question about an individual's First
Amendment freedoms arises when a citizen or journalist is
arrested while verbally challenging, filming, or writing
about police actions. Did the police officer have legitimate
law enforcement reasons for the arrest, or was the arrest in
retaliationfor engaging in First Amendment activities the
officer did not like? Courts have grappled with the best
way to resolve this question, often importing the Fourth
Amendment's bright-line rule about probable cause into
analyses of FirstAmendment retaliatoryarrest claims and
barringthose claims were the officer had probable cause to
arrest. This Note argues that when retaliatory arrest
claims …
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Without A Pilot: Navigating The Space Between The First Amendment And State And Federal Directives Affecting Drone Journalism, Leah M. Davis
Without A Pilot: Navigating The Space Between The First Amendment And State And Federal Directives Affecting Drone Journalism, Leah M. Davis
Georgia Law Review
A new player in American airspace, the drone, creates greater opportunities for news gathering. But with new opportunities, come new rules. Current legislatures, regulators and courts face the challenge of creating and enforcing a legal framework by which this new technology can be integrated into American airspace. The debate surrounding proper drone directives is influenced by competing policies of privacy, security, and First Amendment concerns. This Note surveys past and present state and federal directives on drone use, and argues for the creation of a separate set of guidelines for Press drones. Separate directives would ensure that news outlets are …
The Stealth Press Clause, Sonja R. West
The Stealth Press Clause, Sonja R. West
Georgia Law Review
As we reflect on the 50th anniversary of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, there will likely be many tributes to Sullivan as one of the Supreme Court's most significant press cases. Yet Sullivan was not really a "press" case. The Supreme Court, in its opinion, granted all speakers greater protection against defamation liability regardless of whether they were a member of the press. Sullivan is not the only famous so-called "press" case that was not just about the press. Several more "not-just-the-press" victories followed in Sullivan's wake. New York Times Co. v. United States (the "Pentagon Papers case"), for …
The Dangers Of Press Clause Dicta, Ronnell A. Jones
The Dangers Of Press Clause Dicta, Ronnell A. Jones
Georgia Law Review
If an attorney, scholar, or citizen opened the 448th volume of the U.S. Reports to page 573, she would find herself midway through a case captioned Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia. Context would make clear that the case was brought by a newspaper that wished to report on a criminal trial but was precluded from doing so when the trial judge closed the proceedings. The tenor of the analysis would foreshadow that the newspaper was on its way to a 7-1 victory and a holding that gave it the access it sought to the judicial proceeding. And the tone of …