Digital Commons Network^™

International Arbitration, Sujey Herrera, Marcus Quintanilla, Martine Forneret, Emily Scherker, Jeffrey Rosenthal, James A. Egerton-Vernon, Richard Deutsch, Ranjan Agarwal, Félix Poggio, Rafael Pereyra Zorraquin, Joyce Fong, Dan Perera, Rong Gu, Helen Tang, Weina Ye, Timur Ibrahim Sen, Andrew White, Jayesh H, Dawn Yamane Hewett, Julianne Jaquith, Chelsea Pollard, Ibrahim Sattout, Adnan Gaafar, Myriam Khedair, James Boykin, Stijn Winters, Amanda Lee, Peter Ashford, Sabrina Janzik, Christina Nitsche, Gerard Meijer, Valerie Verberne, Markian Malskyy, Oksana Karel, Daryna Hrebeniuk, Keara A. Bergin, Christopher P. Denicola

The Year in Review

No abstract provided.

International Arbitration, Manuel Liatowitsch, Jonathan Blank, Jeffrey Rosenthal, Martine Forneret, Emily Scherker, Peter Ashford, Sabrina Janzik, Julianne Jaquith, Dawn Yamane Hewett, Rebecca Soquier, Helen Tang, Branda Horrigan, Anne Hoffman, Mitchell Dearness, Markus Schifferl, Christopher Boog, Benjamin Gottlieb, Diepiriye Anga, Sergey Morozov, Markian Malskyy, Oksana Karel, Anowar Zahid, Chad Catterwell, Cyril Cotterall-Debay, William Langran, Timur I. Sen, Keara A. Bergin, Christopher P. Denicola

The Year in Review

No abstract provided.

International Arbitration, Manuel Liatowitsch, Jeffrey Rosenthal, Martine Forneret, Emily Scherker, Peter Ashford, Sabrina Janzik, Matthew J. Weldon, Robert L. Houston, Christopher Boog, Benjamin Gottlieb, Gerard Meijer, Valerie Verberne, Michael Nueber, Alexander Bezborodov, Sergey Morozov, Bruno Guandalini, Hans-Christian Salger, Thomas Försterling, Diepiriye Anga, Sae Youn Kim, Andrew White, Anne Hoffmann, Chad Catterwell, Cyril Cotterall-Debay, William Langran, Timur I. Sen, Helen Tang, Rebecca Soquier, Tracey Cui, Briana Young, Jonathan Blank, Guido Carducci, Clifford J. Hendel, Tamari J. Lagvilava, Keara A. Bergin, Christopher P. Denicola

The Year in Review

No abstract provided.

International Arbitration, Manuel Liatowitsch, Jeffrey Rosenthal, Christopher P. Denicola, Elizabeth M. Hanly, Mauricio Becerra De La Roca Donoso, Diepiriye Anga, James Menz, Guido Carducci, Medhavi Singh, Hanns-Christian Salger, Luping Zhang, Adam Al-Sarraf, Bruno Guandalini, Clifford J. Hendel, Tamari J. Lagilava

The Year in Review

No abstract provided.

Taxing Employers For Imposing Mandatory Arbitration, Class Action Waiver, And Nondisclosure Of Dispute Provisions, Rebecca N. Morrow

SMU Law Review

Employers impose coercive dispute resolution terms on their employees more frequently, more broadly, and with greater legal success than ever before. Recent survey data indicates that mandatory employment arbitration provisions bind more than 60 million American workers—over half of the U.S. private-sector nonunion workforce. Employment class action waivers bind nearly 25 million American workers. In 2018, the Supreme Court held 5–4 that mandatory arbitration provisions and class action waivers imposed by employers on their employees do not violate the National Labor Relations Act. These terms prohibit employees from exposing employer wrongdoing in open court, bar employees with valid wage and …

Arbitration, John Allen Chalk

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Arbitration, John Allen Chalk Sr.

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Arbitration, John Allen Chalk

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

The State Of Investor-State Arbitration: A Reality Check Of The Issues, Trends, And Directions In Asia-Pacific, Julien Chaisse, Rahul Donde

The International Lawyer

No abstract provided.

When Contractual Good Faith Meets A Controversial M&A Issue: The Sandbagging Practice In International Arbitration, Maxime Panhard

The International Lawyer

No abstract provided.

Rule Of Law In The U.A.E.: The Peaceful Path To Nation-Building In Abu Dhabi And The U.A.E. Through Global Best Practices, Valerie J. Pelton

The International Lawyer

No abstract provided.

Alternative Dispute Resolution, Will Pryor

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Implicit Bias And Prejudice In Mediation, Carol Izumi

SMU Law Review

Mediators aspire and endeavor to meet their ethical duty of “neutrality” in mediation. Yet their ability to actually conduct mediations without bias, prejudice, or favoritism toward any party is extraordinarily difficult, if not impossible. Research shows that unconscious mental processes involving stereotypes and attitudes affect our judgments, perceptions, and behavior toward others. Implicit bias, the automatic association of stereotypes and attitudes with social groups, may produce discriminatory responses toward parties despite a mediator’s best efforts at creating an outwardly even-handed process. Even the most well-intentioned and egalitarian mediators must actively engage in bias reduction strategies to mitigate prejudice in mediation.

Do You Believe In Magic?: Self-Determination And Procedural Justice Meet Inequality In Court-Connected Mediation, Nancy Welsh

SMU Law Review

Proponents of the “contemporary mediation movement” promised that parties would be able to exercise self-determination as they participated in mediation. When courts began to mandate the use of mediation, commentators raised doubts about the vitality of self-determination. Though these commentators also suggested a wide variety of reforms, few of their proposals have gained widespread adoption in the courts.

Ensuring the procedural justice of mediation represents another means to ensure self-determination. If mediation provides parties with the opportunity to exercise voice, helps them demonstrate that they have considered what each other had to say, and treats them in an even-handed and …

Critical Procedure: Adr And The Justices’ “Second Wave” Constriction Of Court Access And Claim Development, Eric K. Yamamoto

SMU Law Review

Expansive alternative dispute resolution (ADR) was the centerpiece of efficiency-based procedural reforms in the 1980s and early 1990s. ADR and other reforms collectively altered the litigation landscape, at times for the better. Yet some scholars raised early questions about ADR’s effect on systemic litigation fairness and the ability of the disenfranchised to assert and maintain claims in court. Amid second wave procedural changes, commencing around the mid-2000s, a Justice Scalia-led majority significantly expanded the grasp of compelled, private, and individualized arbitration. Under the shroud of efficiency, that Court majority imposed those second wave changes by judicial fiat, bypassing formal rulemaking. …

The Lost Promise Of Arbitration, Sarah Rudolph Cole

SMU Law Review

This article disputes the notion that arbitration, a historically informal process, tends to disadvantage minority disputants or provide them with quick decisions tainted by prejudice. Responding to Richard Delgado’s seminal work, Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution, this article attempts to shed greater light on the benefits of modern arbitration for minority disputants. Although still capable of improvement, arbitration may well provide greater protections to minority disputants than does litigation. Since Delgado first wrote his article, the use of arbitration as a primary dispute resolution mechanism has increased dramatically, particularly among businesses and …

Influence Of The Arbitral Seat In The Outcome Of An International Commercial Arbitration, Gonzalo Vial

The International Lawyer

No abstract provided.

Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Critical Reconsideration, Richard Delgado

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Negotiating While Female, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

SMU Law Review

Why are women paid less than men? Prevailing ethos conveniently blames the woman and her alleged inability to negotiate. This article argues that blaming women for any lack of negotiation skills or efforts is inaccurate and that prevailing perceptions about women and negotiation are in-deed myths. The first myth is that women do not negotiate. While this is true in some lab studies and among younger women, more recent workplace data calls this platitude into question. The second myth is that women should avoid negotiations because of potential backlash. Although women in leadership do face an ongoing challenge to be …

Does Alternative Dispute Resolution Facilitate Prejudice And Bias? We Still Don’T Know, Gilat J. Bachar, Deborah R. Hensler

SMU Law Review

By the time Professor Richard Delgado and his colleagues wrote their seminal article on the risk of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) facilitating prejudice, ADR programs were well-established in the United States, supported by legislative and court mandates, private contracts, and U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution and Delgado’s subsequent review article, ADR and the Dispossessed: Recent Books About the Deformalization Movement, were cited hundreds of times by scholars and practitioners but did little to stop the movement to substitute mediation, arbitration, and other dispute resolution procedures for public adjudication. …

Contextual Analysis In Arbitration, Pat K. Chew

SMU Law Review

The arbitration process is embedded in a much larger context than the four walls in which the arbitration occurs. Exploring and studying that context—including the arbitral institution, the arbitrators, each party, the arbitration process, and the broader cultural and political environment—inform what actually occurs and to what extent one party may have inherent advantages over the other. This article illustrates this contextual analysis in two diverse settings: domestic employment arbitrations and international trade arbitrations. These analyses reveal one party’s advantages over the other, which are explained in part by market and cultural forces in which these arbitrations are embedded. Interdisciplinary, …

Do Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Disadvantage Women And Minorities?, Charles Craver

SMU Law Review

When different legal controversies arise, parties frequently employ alternative dispute resolution procedures to resolve them. Yet some members of ethnic minority groups and women may seek judicial proceedings out of a concern that their ethnicity or gender may undermine their ability to achieve beneficial bargaining outcomes through ADR. This article addresses the real and perceived challenges of ethnic minorities and women in ADR. It draws upon decades of research into dispute resolution bargaining processes to illustrate that most traits associated with ethnicity and gender are irrelevant today with respect to ADR. When persons are taught even minimally about the bargaining …

Dispute System Design And Bias In Dispute Resolution, Lisa Blomgren Amsler, Alexander B. Avtgis, Michael Scott Jackman

SMU Law Review

This article examines the role of mediator race and gender in perceptions of procedural justice as measure of accountability and representative bureaucracy in a national mediation program for complaints of employment discrimination at a large federal organization, the United States Postal Service. Mediation represents a forum of accountability in which employees may hold an employer accountable for violating federal law prohibiting forms of employment discrimination, in this case, race discrimination, sex discrimination, and sexual harassment. Representative bureaucracy theory suggests passive or symbolic representation when the demographics of public officials should mirror those of the public they serve. Some research suggests …

Reconsidering Prejudice In Alternative Dispute Resolution For Black Work Matters, Michael Z. Green

SMU Law Review

In the 1985 foundational article Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution, Richard Delgado and his co-authors identified major concerns with the growing use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to resolve disputes involving people of color. The seminal findings from that article highlighted the power differentials exacerbated by informal dispute resolution, and the article contributed immediately to a surge of robust critiques of the increasing use of alternative dispute resolution for those most vulnerable in our society.

More than thirty years after the Delgado article, a community of respected and prominent ADR and discrimination …

Promotion Of Green Electricity And International Dispute Settlement: Trade And Investment Issues, Sherzod Shadikhodjaev

The International Lawyer

The issue of greater utilization of renewables in energy supply-mix has become a priority environmental agenda in many countries. Feed-in incentives, quota schemes, public tenders and net metering are common support programmes that are designed to encourage the production and consumption of electricity generated from renewable energy sources. Promotion policies of this kind have provoked a number of international disputes at both global and regional levels. This article examines disputes brought to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Court of Justice of the European Union (“Court of Justice”) and investor-state tribunals, and explores some intersectional implications and comparisons for the …

International Arbitration, Manuel Liatowitsch, Jeffrey Rosenthal, Christopher P. Denicola, Elizabeth M. Hanly, Mauricio Becerra De La Roca Donoso, Diepiriye Anga, James Menz, Guido Carducci, Medhavi Singh, Hanns-Christian Salger

The International Lawyer

No abstract provided.

Defining Civil Disputes: Lessons From Two Jurisdictions, Elizabeth G. Thornburg, Camille Cameron

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Court systems have adopted a variety of mechanisms to narrow the issues in dispute and expedite litigation. This article analyses the largely unsuccessful attempts in two jurisdictions - the United States and Australia - to achieve early and efficient issue identification in civil disputes. Procedures that rely on pleadings to provide focus have failed for centuries, from the common (English) origins of these two systems to their divergent modern paths. Case management practices that are developing in the United States and Australia offer greater promise in the continuing quest for early, efficient dispute definition. Based on a historical and contemporary …

Designer Trials, Elizabeth G. Thornburg

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

This article considers the intersection of freedom of contract and the trials that have not vanished. Could contracting parties effectively agree in advance of a dispute that any litigation of the case will comply with certain rules? Would such an agreement be enforced even in a contract of adhesion? If so, parties with sufficient bargaining leverage could design away many of the characteristics of litigation that they find unappealing, without the need to resort to private processes. The result: a designer trial with the procedural deck stacked in favor of the party with the greatest pre-dispute bargaining power.

Such a …

Contracting With Tortfeasors: Mandatory Arbitration Clauses And Personal Injury Claims, Elizabeth G. Thornburg

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

People thinking about contractual arbitration clauses usually envision the resulting disputes as contractual in nature. However, there is also a group of cases in which the clauses are used to compel arbitration of personal injury claims. This article examines those cases, including the impact of the Federal Arbitration Act on their enforcement. Next, the article considers the ways in which these pre-dispute, mandatory arbitration clauses can disturb the traditional values of procedural justice, contractual fairness, and the enforcement of tort-based duties. Finally, the article proposes changes in the law of arbitration and evaluates whether such changes are politically feasible.

Fast, Cheap & Out Of Control: Lessons From The Icann Dispute Resolution Process, Elizabeth G. Thornburg

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Some people have argued that the uniform dispute resolution process used by ICANN to resolve domain name disputes would be a good model for internet disputes generally. This article argues the opposite: the UDRP teaches sobering lessons about the consequences of privatized dispute resolution processes. The lessons include: the questionable legitimacy of privately-adopted substantive standards; the danger of unprincipled choice of law decisions to fill in the gaps in that private law; unreconciled splits among arbitrators as to the meaning of the standards; and a tendency to expand beyond the narrow jurisdictional limits of the policy. The UDRP also demonstrates …