Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Arbitration (3)
- Ethics (2)
- Arbitraj (1)
- Arbitrajul international (1)
- Channel Tunnel (1)
-
- Choice of law (1)
- Conflicts of law (1)
- Construction law (1)
- Dreptual arbital (1)
- Federal rules of civil procedure (1)
- International law (1)
- Investment (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Litigation funding (1)
- Memorial (1)
- Model rules of professional responsibility (1)
- Mustill (1)
- Procedure (1)
- Professional responsibility (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Securities (1)
- Third-party litigation funding (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Equality Of Arms In Arbitration: Cost And Benefits, William W. Park
Equality Of Arms In Arbitration: Cost And Benefits, William W. Park
Faculty Scholarship
Depending on context and content, a regulatory framework can either help or hinder efforts to enhance aggregate social and economic welfare. Lively debate has arisen with respect to the net effects of two recent sets of directives for lawyer comportment in cross-border arbitration, the first being Guidelines adopted by the International Bar Association, the second contained in new arbitration rules promulgated by the London Court of International Arbitration. Each instrument aims to promote a more level playing field on matters where legal cultures differ, such as document production and counsel independence. Each has caused thoughtful commentators to question the need …
Michael Mustill: A Reminiscence, William W. Park
Michael Mustill: A Reminiscence, William W. Park
Faculty Scholarship
The arbitration world lost a giant when Michael Mustill departed in April of this year, just a few days short of his 84th birthday. A man of enormous intellect and wit, with a fine capacity for sincere friendship, this generous Yorkshireman enriched us through contributions as counsel, judge, scholar, and mentor.
Lord Mustill And The Channel Tunnel Case, William W. Park
Lord Mustill And The Channel Tunnel Case, William W. Park
Faculty Scholarship
Over two decades ago, in the now legendary Channel Tunnel Case, the British House of Lords (as it then was) was asked to provide judicial support for the efficient completion of a monumental construction project. The decision in that matter, penned by the late Lord Mustill, illustrates the delicate interplay between the dynamics of otherwise applicable law and the bespoke arbitration framework chosen by sophisticated parties to govern their dispute.
Harmonizing Third-Party Litigation Funding Regulation, Victoria Sahani
Harmonizing Third-Party Litigation Funding Regulation, Victoria Sahani
Faculty Scholarship
Third-party litigation funding is no longer a new phenomenon, but rather is a mainstay in global commerce and dispute resolution. Yet many observers still consider the third-party litigation funding industry as a “wild west” due to a lack of regulation in many countries. Some of the countries that have regulations suffer from a lack of uniformity and an array of conflicting laws at the sub-national level (i.e., the laws of states, provinces, territories, etc.). For example, the United States has a confusing patchwork of state laws on third-party litigation funding. This Article proposes harmonizing the regulatory framework for third-party litigation …
Dreptul Arbitral, Explicat, William W. Park