Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Charging decision (1)
- Confinement (1)
- Crime victims (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal prosecutions (1)
-
- Dissolution (1)
- Executive authority (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Federal prison system (1)
- Injunction (1)
- Institutional reform (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Modification (1)
- Permanent injunction (1)
- Prison (1)
- Prison reform (1)
- Prison system (1)
- Prosecution (1)
- Prosecutorial discretion (1)
- Reform (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- State prison system (1)
- Unconstitutional conditions (1)
- Utilitarian (1)
- Victim participation (1)
- Victims (1)
- Young v United States ex rel Vuitton Et Fils S.A. (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Judicial Vigilantism: Inherent Judicial Authority To Appoint Contempt Prosecutors In Young V. United States Ex Rel Vuitton Et Fils S.A., Neal Devins, Steven J. Mulroy
Judicial Vigilantism: Inherent Judicial Authority To Appoint Contempt Prosecutors In Young V. United States Ex Rel Vuitton Et Fils S.A., Neal Devins, Steven J. Mulroy
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Prison Reform Issues For The Eighties: Modification And Dissolution Of Injunctions In The Federal Courts, Sarah N. Welling, Barbara W. Jones
Prison Reform Issues For The Eighties: Modification And Dissolution Of Injunctions In The Federal Courts, Sarah N. Welling, Barbara W. Jones
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
During the past two decades, federal courts have become involved in the supervision of state and local prison systems. This supervisory role is the result of a new type of litigation, the institutional reform lawsuit. These lawsuits originate when prisoners sue state or local prison administrators, alleging unconstitutional conditions of confinement. Plaintiffs usually seek a permanent injunction outlining a plan to eliminate the offending conditions. As prison litigation matured, the normal evolution of these lawsuits led to new questions taking center stage in the 1980's, questions of injunction, modification, and dissolution.
This article begins with a summary examination of prison …
Victims In The Criminal Process: A Utilitarian Analysis Of Victim Participation In The Charging Decision, Sarah N. Welling
Victims In The Criminal Process: A Utilitarian Analysis Of Victim Participation In The Charging Decision, Sarah N. Welling
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Crime victims are currently being given the right to participate in criminal prosecutions at both the sentencing and plea bargaining stages. These are important steps in a criminal prosecution, but both the sentence and the plea bargain are dependent on the initial charging decision which determines what crime is to be prosecuted or whether there is to be any prosecution at all. As a prerequisite to both a plea bargain or a sentence, the charging decision is the crux of the prosecution.
Given the importance of the charging decision, and the fact that some jurisdictions have granted victims a right …