Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AEDPA (1)
- Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (1)
- Batson (1)
- Domestic violence (1)
- Due process (1)
-
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Exemption (1)
- Failure-to appear (FTA) warrants; Arkansas has two laws addressing FTA -- ARK. CODE ANN. §§ 16-13-701–703 (2019 )and § 16-10-108(a)(3) (2019); Single federal statute addressing FTA -- 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (2019); FTA and "reasonable excuse"; (1)
- Federal habeas corpus (1)
- Flowers v. Mississippi (1)
- Griffith retroactivity rule (1)
- Intimate partner violence (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jury selection (1)
- Marital (1)
- Peremptory challenges (1)
- Petition for review (1)
- Post-conviction (1)
- Prosecution (1)
- Prosecutorial misconduct (1)
- Race and incarceration in Arkansas; sentencing disparities in Arkansas; science of racial bias and the criminal justice system; AMI Crim. 2d 101; efficacy of jury instructions concerning racial bias; juror bias during deliberations; Peña-Rodriguez decision (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Reversal (1)
- Sexual assault (1)
- Spousal (1)
- Stone v. Powell (1)
- Teague (1)
- Vacating the sentence (1)
- Writ of certiorari (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Till Death Do Us Part: The Legal Remedies Of Sexual Assault In Marriage - Or Lack Thereof, Kaylyn Presley
Till Death Do Us Part: The Legal Remedies Of Sexual Assault In Marriage - Or Lack Thereof, Kaylyn Presley
The Arkansas Journal of Social Change and Public Service
No abstract provided.
Moving The Needle: Two Promising Tools To Attack Arkansas’S Racial Disparity In Criminal Sentencing, Anastasia M. Boles
Moving The Needle: Two Promising Tools To Attack Arkansas’S Racial Disparity In Criminal Sentencing, Anastasia M. Boles
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ethical And Aggressive Appellate Advocacy: The Decision To Petition For Certiorari In Criminal Cases, J. Thomas Sullivan
Ethical And Aggressive Appellate Advocacy: The Decision To Petition For Certiorari In Criminal Cases, J. Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
Over the past six decades, United States Supreme Court decisions have dramatically reshaped the criminal justice process to provide significant protections for defendants charged in federal and state proceedings, reflecting a remarkable expansion of due process and specific constitutional guarantees. For criminal defendants seeking relief based on recognition of new rules of constitutional criminal procedure, application of existing rules or precedent to novel factual scenarios, or in some cases, enforcement of existing precedent, obtaining relief requires further action on the Court’s part. In those situations, the Court’s exercise of its certiorari jurisdiction is the exclusive remedy offering an avenue for …
Disappearing Act: Arkansas’S Circularly-Defined Default, Judge Victor A. Fleming
Disappearing Act: Arkansas’S Circularly-Defined Default, Judge Victor A. Fleming
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law—The Call For An Adequate Remedy: The Lack Of Deterrence And Judicial Consequences For Prosecutors Who Habitually Violate Batson, Altimease Lowe
Criminal Law—The Call For An Adequate Remedy: The Lack Of Deterrence And Judicial Consequences For Prosecutors Who Habitually Violate Batson, Altimease Lowe
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.