Digital Commons Network^™

Toward A Theory Of Procedural Justice For Juveniles, Tamar R. Birckhead

Tamar R Birckhead

Courts and legislatures have long been reluctant to make use of the data, findings, and recommendations generated by other disciplines when determining questions of legal procedure affecting juveniles, particularly when the research has been produced by social scientists. However, given the United States Supreme Court’s recent invocation of developmental psychology in Roper v. Simmons, which invalidated the juvenile death penalty, there is reason to believe that such resistance is waning. In 2005 the Simmons Court found, inter alia, that based on research on adolescent development, juveniles are not as culpable as adults and, therefore, cannot be classified among the “worst …

Fair Process And Fair Play: Professionally Responsible Cross-Examination, John F. Nivala

John F. Nivala

No abstract provided.

Secret Indictments: How To Discourage Them, How To Make Them Fair, John T. Stinson

John T Stinson Jr.

This article reveals an overlooked problem in federal criminal procedure that permits the government to indict individuals in secret and stall prosecutions to the detriment of fundamental rights. Constitutional and statutory protections ensure that criminal prosecutions in America are swift, open, and subject to thorough confrontational testing. Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, however, permits the open-ended cloaking of criminal indictments following an ex parte government request for a seal. Court interpretations of Rule 6 sealing have further eroded fundamental protections by declaring that a showing of substantial prejudice by a criminal defendant will be the only …

Step Out Of The Car: License, Registration, And Dna Please, Brian Gallini

Brian Gallini