Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (2)
- Bias (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal trials (1)
- Foreign Affairs Prosecutions (1)
-
- Foreign relations (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- George Floyd (1)
- International Criminal Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Juror discrimination (1)
- Juror selection (1)
- Jurors (1)
- Mass arrest (1)
- Peremptory challenge (1)
- Protests (1)
- Race (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Racial justice (1)
- Transnational Criminal Law (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
"Hey, Hey! Ho, Ho! These Mass Arrests Have Got To Go!": The Expressive Fourth Amendment Argument, Karen Pita Loor
"Hey, Hey! Ho, Ho! These Mass Arrests Have Got To Go!": The Expressive Fourth Amendment Argument, Karen Pita Loor
Faculty Scholarship
The racial justice protests ignited by the murder of George Floyd in May 2020 constitute the largest protest movement in the United States. Estimates suggest that between fifteen and twenty-six million people protested across the country during the summer of 2020 alone. Not only were the number of protestors staggering, but so were the number of arrests. Within one week of when the video of George Floyd’s murder went viral, police arrested ten thousand people demanding justice on American streets, with police often arresting activists en masse. This Essay explores mass arrests and how they square with Fourth Amendment …
Rethinking Batson-Soares, Brian A. Wilson
Rethinking Batson-Soares, Brian A. Wilson
Faculty Scholarship
As the American trial by jury system approaches its 400th year, unlawful discrimination in the selection of jurors remains a pressing issue. The peremptory challenge process – by which a party may object to the seating of a juror for virtually any reason without having to explain its motivation – has faced increasing scrutiny in the criminal trial context. Though not constitutionally guaranteed, the peremptory challenge has been hailed as having an “important role in assuring the constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury,” enabling a defendant to eliminate prospective jurors “whom he perceives to be prejudiced against him” …
The Criminalization Of Foreign Relations, Steven Arrigg Koh
The Criminalization Of Foreign Relations, Steven Arrigg Koh
Faculty Scholarship
Overcriminalization has rightly generated national condemnation among policymakers, scholars, and practitioners alike. And yet, such scholarship often assumes that the encroachment of criminal justice stops at our borders. This Article argues that our foreign relations are also at risk of overcriminalization due to overzealous prosecution, overreaching legislation, and presidential politicization—and that this may be particularly problematic when U.S. criminal justice supplants certain nonpenal U.S. foreign policies abroad. This Article proposes three key reforms— presidential distancing, prosecutorial integration, and legislative de-escalation—to assure a principled place for criminal justice in foreign relations.
Othering Across Borders, Steven Arrigg Koh
Othering Across Borders, Steven Arrigg Koh
Faculty Scholarship
Our contemporary moment of reckoning presents an opportunity to evaluate racial subordination and structural inequality throughout our three-tiered domestic, transnational, and international criminal law system. In particular, this Essay exposes a pernicious racial dynamic in contemporary U.S. global criminal justice policy, which I call othering across borders. First, this othering may occur when race emboldens political and prosecutorial actors to prosecute foreign defendants. Second, racial animus may undermine U.S. engagement with international criminal legal institutions, specifically the International Criminal Court. This Essay concludes with measures to mitigate such othering.