Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Sigtarp And The Executive-Legislative Clash: Confronting A Bowsher Issue With An Eye Toward Preserving The Separation Of Powers During Future Crisis Legislation, Aaron R. Sims
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Business Interests Cases - October 2009 Term, Leon D. Lazer Honorable, Leon Friedman
Business Interests Cases - October 2009 Term, Leon D. Lazer Honorable, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Finding Sigtarp In The Separation Of Powers Labyrinth, Jonathan R. Siegel
Finding Sigtarp In The Separation Of Powers Labyrinth, Jonathan R. Siegel
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sigtarp: A Problem In Name Only?, Adam F. Scales
Sigtarp: A Problem In Name Only?, Adam F. Scales
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Limiting Legislative Courts: Protecting Article Iii From Article I Evisceration, Kenneth G. Coffin
Limiting Legislative Courts: Protecting Article Iii From Article I Evisceration, Kenneth G. Coffin
Barry Law Review
This article will analyze possible limitations on Congress’ Article I power, concluding that separation of powers jurisprudence offers a practical and appropriate manner in which to check Congressional overreach. Part I traces the development of Congress’ power to create Article I courts. Part II critically evaluates the Northern Pipeline opinions, ultimately finding neither Justice Brennan’s nor Justice White’s conflicting opinions satisfactory. Part III briefly discusses several possible limiting principles on Article I courts before concluding that separation of powers jurisprudence offers a meaningful and pragmatic solution to the problem. Part IV tests the practicality of this new separation of powers …