Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Defining Instrumentalities Of Deadly Force, Tim Longo
Defining Instrumentalities Of Deadly Force, Tim Longo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity: Further Developments In The Post-Pearson Era, Karen M. Blum
Qualified Immunity: Further Developments In The Post-Pearson Era, Karen M. Blum
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Twombly And Iqbal: The Introduction Of A Heightened Pleading Standard, Shira A. Sheindlin Honorable
Twombly And Iqbal: The Introduction Of A Heightened Pleading Standard, Shira A. Sheindlin Honorable
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Wrongful Conviction Claims Under Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Robert W. Pratt Honorable
Wrongful Conviction Claims Under Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Robert W. Pratt Honorable
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
When A Door Closes, A Window Opens: Using Preemption To Challenge State Medicaid Cutbacks, Martina Brendel
When A Door Closes, A Window Opens: Using Preemption To Challenge State Medicaid Cutbacks, Martina Brendel
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Following the Supreme Court's 2002 decision in Gonzaga University v. Doe, several circuit courts of appeal have disallowed enforcement of key Medicaid provisions under § 1983. Notably, courts have placed no similar restrictions on the enforceability of these provisions under the Supremacy Clause. This article discusses Lankford v. Sherman and Independent Living Center v. Shewry, two recent appellate decisions in which plaintiffs succeeded in preventing Medicaid cuts under a preemption theory. It then addresses the limits of the Supremacy Clause, which applies to a narrower range of state action than § 1983. It argues that Medicaid reimbursement rates are "laws" …