Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abbott (1)
- Absolute immunity (1)
- BFOQ (1)
- Bona fide occupational qualification (1)
- Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. (1)
-
- Color of state law (1)
- Correspondence (1)
- Direct evidence (1)
- Disparate impact (1)
- Disparate treatment (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free citizens (1)
- Goldberg v. Town of Rocky Hill (1)
- Grant v. General Motors (1)
- Hazen Paper Company v. Biggins (1)
- Immunity (1)
- Legislative immunity (1)
- Levine (1)
- Mail (1)
- Malicious prosecution (1)
- Martin Schwartz (1)
- Municipal liability (1)
- Municipalities (1)
- Nonprisoners (1)
- Officials (1)
- Outgoing prisoner mail (1)
- Prison (1)
- Prison regulations (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Restricting The Right Of Correspondence In The Prison Context: Thornburgh V. Abbott And Its Progeny, Samuel J. Levine
Restricting The Right Of Correspondence In The Prison Context: Thornburgh V. Abbott And Its Progeny, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
In Thornburgh v. Abbott, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of regulations that allowed prison officials to reject certain publications sent by publishers to prisoners. Finding the regulations reasonably related to legitimate penological interests, the Court for the first time applied a reasonableness standard to restrictions that directly affected the First Amendment rights of nonprisoners. Part I of this Note briefly reviews the instrumental Supreme Court decisions addressing First Amendment rights in the prison context. This Part traces the development of the standard of review for prison regulations that restrict First Amendment freedoms for both prisoners and nonprisoners. It concludes …
Employment Discrimination: Recent Developments In The Supreme Court (Symposium: The Supreme Court And Local Government Law: The 1992-93 Term), Eileen Kaufman
Employment Discrimination: Recent Developments In The Supreme Court (Symposium: The Supreme Court And Local Government Law: The 1992-93 Term), Eileen Kaufman
Scholarly Works
At a symposium entitled, “The Supreme Court and Local Government Law; The 1992/93 Term”, Professor Eileen Kaufman spoke about the cases involving employment discrimination that were decided during that particular Term, Hazen Paper Company v. Biggins and St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks. While Hazen is an age discrimination case and St. Mary's is a Title VII case, they can be viewed as companion cases which serve to explain what an employment discrimination plaintiff must now establish when attempting to prove disparate treatment by indirect evidence. By way of preview, suffice it to say that plaintiff's task has been made …
Section 1983 In The Second Circuit, Martin A. Schwartz
Section 1983 In The Second Circuit, Martin A. Schwartz
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.