Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 2017 Inauguration Day (1)
- ABA (1)
- Assistance (1)
- Chuck Grassley (1)
- Client-centered (1)
-
- Confirmation (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Counsel (1)
- Cross-examination (1)
- Decision (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Defense (1)
- Deference (1)
- Democrats (1)
- Effective (1)
- Ethic (1)
- Ethical (1)
- Filibusters (1)
- GOP (1)
- Guideline (1)
- Harry Reid (1)
- Jimmy Carter (1)
- Judge Merrick Garland (1)
- Judiciary Committee Chair (1)
- Lame duck (1)
- Lawyer (1)
- Lawyer-centered (1)
- Lower courts (1)
- Mitch McConnel (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Constitutional Limits Of Client-Centered Decision Making, Todd A. Berger
The Constitutional Limits Of Client-Centered Decision Making, Todd A. Berger
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Confirming Judges In The 2016 Senate Lame Duck Session, Carl W. Tobias
Confirming Judges In The 2016 Senate Lame Duck Session, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
In this piece, Professor Carl Tobias descriptively scrutinizes the nomination and confirmation regimes throughout the administration of President Barack Obama. The article critically evaluates selection finding that persistent Republican Senate obstruction resulted in the greatest number of unoccupied posts for the longest duration, briefly moderated by the 2013 detonation of the “nuclear option,” which constricted filibusters. Nevertheless, the article contends when the Grand Old Party (GOP) attained a chamber majority, Republicans dramatically slowed the nomination and confirmation processes after January 2015. Therefore, openings surpassed ninety before Congress is scheduled to reassemble. Because this dilemma erodes rapid, inexpensive, and equitable disposition, …