Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 25 U.S.C. § 1302 (1)
- 25 U.S.C. § 1302(a)(2) (1)
- Anthropocene (1)
- Anthropogenic (1)
- Arrest (1)
-
- Carbon footprint (1)
- Carbon neutral (1)
- Carbon tax (1)
- Clean air (1)
- Clean and healthful environment (1)
- Clean energy (1)
- Clean water (1)
- Climate action (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Climate crisis (1)
- Climate emergency (1)
- Climate justice (1)
- Climate litigation (1)
- Climate policy (1)
- Constitutional challenge (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Criminal jurisdiction (1)
- Crow Reservation (1)
- Crow Treaty (1)
- Crow Tribe (1)
- Crow Tribe Police Department (1)
- Custodial arrest (1)
- DEQ (1)
- DNRC (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Held V. State, Alec D. Skuntz
Held V. State, Alec D. Skuntz
Public Land & Resources Law Review
On March 13, 2020, a group of 16 Montana children and teenagers filed a complaint in the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County against the State of Montana and several state agencies. These young Plaintiffs sought injunctive and declaratory relief against Defendants for their complicity in continuing to extract and release harmful amounts of greenhouse gases which contribute to climate change. Plaintiffs premised their argument on the Montana Constitution’s robust environmental rights and protections. The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss which the District Court granted in-part and denied in-part. Held provides a roadmap for future litigation by elucidating …
Preview—United States V. Cooley: What Will Happen To The Thinnest Blue Line?, Jo J. Phippin
Preview—United States V. Cooley: What Will Happen To The Thinnest Blue Line?, Jo J. Phippin
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States ("Supreme Court") will hear oral arguments in this matter on Tuesday, March 23, 2021. This case presents the narrow issue of whether a tribal police officer has the authority to investigate and detain a non-Indian on a public right-of-way within a reservation for a suspected violation of state or federal law. The lower courts, holding that tribes have no such authority, granted James Cooley’s motion to suppress evidence. The Supreme Court must decide whether the lower courts erred in so deciding. While the issue before the Supreme Court is itself narrow, it has …