Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
What The Hein Decision Can Tell Us About The Roberts Court And The Establishment Clause, Carl H. Esbeck
What The Hein Decision Can Tell Us About The Roberts Court And The Establishment Clause, Carl H. Esbeck
Faculty Publications
This extended essay plays off the Supreme Court's recent decision in Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2553 (2007) (plurality opinion), rejecting taxpayer standing where the claim on the merits challenges discretionary actions by officials in the executive branch said to violate the establishment clause. While the matter directly at hand is the scope of taxpayer standing first permitted in Flast v. Cohen (1968), the essay uses the "injury in fact" requirement for standing to delve into the manner by which the four opinions in Hein give us insight into how the Roberts Court will approach …
Where's The Harm?: Free Speech And The Regulation Of Lies, Lyrissa Lidsky
Where's The Harm?: Free Speech And The Regulation Of Lies, Lyrissa Lidsky
Faculty Publications
The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the First Amendment to accord a measure of protection to outright lies. This essay seeks to explain why. Using Holocaust denial as an example of verifiably false speech, this essay poses the question of whether such speech poses a more serious danger than First Amendment jurisprudence traditionally has acknowledged. This essay also probes the unintended consequences of governmental attempts to impose criminal punishment on lies.
The 60th Anniversary Of The Everson Decision And America's Church-State Proposition, Carl H. Esbeck
The 60th Anniversary Of The Everson Decision And America's Church-State Proposition, Carl H. Esbeck
Faculty Publications
Sixty years ago the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Everson v. Board of Education of Ewing Township, which for the first time incorporated the Establishment Clause through the Fourteenth Amendment and made it binding on state and local governments. The case marks the beginning of the Court's modern era with respect to church-state relations. In Everson, the Justices said that the restraints on federal power represented by the Establishment Clause were the same as the ideas that emerged from the disestablishment struggles in the several states, with special attention to the Virginia experience. The disestablishment effort in the states, which …