Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Privacy (5)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Executive powers (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Due process (3)
-
- Criminal procedure (2)
- Death penalty (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Guns (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Right to counsel (2)
- Surveillance (2)
- 2016 presidential election (1)
- Abuse (1)
- Abuse of discretion (1)
- Appellate review (1)
- Asia (1)
- Bail (1)
- Batson (1)
- Brady claims (1)
- Bullycide (1)
- Bullying (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Census (1)
- Civil suits (1)
- Commerce (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Commerce clause (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 55
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Automated Fourth Amendment, Maneka Sinha
The Automated Fourth Amendment, Maneka Sinha
Faculty Scholarship
Courts routinely defer to police officer judgments in reasonable suspicion and probable cause determinations. Increasingly, though, police officers outsource these threshold judgments to new forms of technology that purport to predict and detect crime and identify those responsible. These policing technologies automate core police determinations about whether crime is occurring and who is responsible. Criminal procedure doctrine has failed to insist on some level of scrutiny of—or skepticism about—the reliability of this technology. Through an original study analyzing numerous state and federal court opinions, this Article exposes the implications of law enforcement’s reliance on these practices given the weighty interests …
Hernandez V. Mesa: Preserving The Zone Of Constitutional Uncertainty At The Border, Alexandra A. Botsaris
Hernandez V. Mesa: Preserving The Zone Of Constitutional Uncertainty At The Border, Alexandra A. Botsaris
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pena-Rodriguez V. Colorado: Elevating A Constitutional Exception Above The Tanner Framework, Caroline Covington
Pena-Rodriguez V. Colorado: Elevating A Constitutional Exception Above The Tanner Framework, Caroline Covington
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Multiracial Malaise: Multiracial As A Legal Racial Category, Taunya L. Banks
Multiracial Malaise: Multiracial As A Legal Racial Category, Taunya L. Banks
Faculty Scholarship
One byproduct of increased interracial marriages post Loving is a growing number of multiracial children. This cohort of multiracials tends to overshadow older and larger generations of multiracial people whose genealogical mixture is more distant. Some interracial couples, their multiracial children and others support a multiracial category on the U.S. Census. Proponents argued that multiracial individuals experience a unique type of discrimination that warrants treating them as a separate racial category. This article concedes that multiracial individuals should enjoy the freedom to self-identify as they wish, and like others, be protected by anti-discrimination law. It concludes, however, that current arguments …
Threats To Democratic Stability: Comparing The Elections Of 2016 And 1860, Stuart Chinn
Threats To Democratic Stability: Comparing The Elections Of 2016 And 1860, Stuart Chinn
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, Davon Jones V. State Of Maryland, No. 547, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Matthew T. Healy
Brief Of Appellant, Davon Jones V. State Of Maryland, No. 547, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Matthew T. Healy
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, John Hill V. State Of Maryland, No. 2740, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Silva Georgian
Brief Of Appellant, John Hill V. State Of Maryland, No. 2740, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Silva Georgian
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Negotiations In The Aftermath Of Koontz, Daniel P. Selmi
Negotiations In The Aftermath Of Koontz, Daniel P. Selmi
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Muscle Memory And The Local Concentration Of Capital Punishment, Lee B. Kovarsky
Muscle Memory And The Local Concentration Of Capital Punishment, Lee B. Kovarsky
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Privacy, Police Power, And The Growth Of Public Power In The Early Twentieth Century: A Not So Unlikely Coexistence, Carol Nackenoff
Privacy, Police Power, And The Growth Of Public Power In The Early Twentieth Century: A Not So Unlikely Coexistence, Carol Nackenoff
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Private And Public Revisited Once Again, Mark A. Graber
Foreword: Private And Public Revisited Once Again, Mark A. Graber
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Last Stand: Restricting Voting Rights & Sustaining White Power In Modern America, Desmond S. King, Rogers M. Smith
The Last Stand: Restricting Voting Rights & Sustaining White Power In Modern America, Desmond S. King, Rogers M. Smith
Schmooze 'tickets'
No abstract provided.
Kaley V. United States: Sanctifying Grand Jury Determinations And Marginalizing The Right To Counsel Of Choice, Laura Merkey
Kaley V. United States: Sanctifying Grand Jury Determinations And Marginalizing The Right To Counsel Of Choice, Laura Merkey
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Clapper V. Amnesty International Usa: Allowing The Fisa Amendments Act Of 2008 To Turn "Incidentally" Into "Certainly", Liz Clark Rinehart
Clapper V. Amnesty International Usa: Allowing The Fisa Amendments Act Of 2008 To Turn "Incidentally" Into "Certainly", Liz Clark Rinehart
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fouling The First Amendment: Why Colleges Can't, And Shouldn't, Control Student Athletes' Speech On Social Media, Frank D. Lomonte
Fouling The First Amendment: Why Colleges Can't, And Shouldn't, Control Student Athletes' Speech On Social Media, Frank D. Lomonte
Journal of Business & Technology Law
No abstract provided.
State Prisoners With Federal Claims In Federal Court: When Can A State Prisoner Overcome Procedural Default?, Megan Raker
State Prisoners With Federal Claims In Federal Court: When Can A State Prisoner Overcome Procedural Default?, Megan Raker
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Shattered Looking Glass: The Pitfalls And Potential Of The Mosaic Theory Of Fourth Amendment Privacy, David C. Gray, Danielle Keats Citron
A Shattered Looking Glass: The Pitfalls And Potential Of The Mosaic Theory Of Fourth Amendment Privacy, David C. Gray, Danielle Keats Citron
Faculty Scholarship
On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court issued a landmark non-decision in United States v. Jones. In that case, officers used a GPS-enabled device to track a suspect’s public movements for four weeks, amassing a considerable amount of data in the process. Although ultimately resolved on narrow grounds, five Justices joined concurring opinions in Jones expressing sympathy for some version of the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment privacy. This theory holds that we maintain reasonable expectations of privacy in certain quantities of information even if we do not have such expectations in the constituent parts. This Article examines and …
The Best Of Both Worlds: Applying Federal Commerce And State Police Powers To Reduce Prescription Drug Abuse, Michael C. Barnes, Gretchen Arndt
The Best Of Both Worlds: Applying Federal Commerce And State Police Powers To Reduce Prescription Drug Abuse, Michael C. Barnes, Gretchen Arndt
Journal of Health Care Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Perry V. New Hampshire: Abandoning The Supreme Court's Fundamental Concern With Eyewitness Reliability, Shaun Gates
Perry V. New Hampshire: Abandoning The Supreme Court's Fundamental Concern With Eyewitness Reliability, Shaun Gates
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Passive-Aggressive Executive Power, Corinna Barrett Lain
Passive-Aggressive Executive Power, Corinna Barrett Lain
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Implications Of The President’S Appointment Power, Peter E. Quint
Implications Of The President’S Appointment Power, Peter E. Quint
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Executive Power: From The Constitutional Periphery To The Constitutional Core, Mark A. Graber
Foreword: Executive Power: From The Constitutional Periphery To The Constitutional Core, Mark A. Graber
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Dangerous Fantasy Of Lincoln: Framing Executive Power As Presidential Mastery, Julie Novkov
The Dangerous Fantasy Of Lincoln: Framing Executive Power As Presidential Mastery, Julie Novkov
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Klein, Then And Now, Gordon G. Young
United States V. Klein, Then And Now, Gordon G. Young
Faculty Scholarship
United States v. Klein, decided during Reconstruction, was the first Supreme Court case to invalidate a statutory restriction on federal courts’ jurisdiction. It is the only one to do so by finding a violation of Article III of the Constitution. Klein has been cited in thirty-three United States Supreme Court opinions, and roughly five hundred times each by lower federal courts and law journal articles. Recent commentators have read Klein both too broadly and narrowly. Its central holding is that Congress may not grant federal courts jurisdiction to decide a set of cases on the merits while depriving them …
Davis V. United States: Good Faith, Retroactivity, And The Loss Of Principle, David Mcaloon
Davis V. United States: Good Faith, Retroactivity, And The Loss Of Principle, David Mcaloon
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Child, Please – Stop The Anti-Queer School Bullycides: A Modest Proposal To Hoist Social Conservatives By Their Own “God, Guns, And Gays” Petard, David Groshoff
Child, Please – Stop The Anti-Queer School Bullycides: A Modest Proposal To Hoist Social Conservatives By Their Own “God, Guns, And Gays” Petard, David Groshoff
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
The Right To Refuse: Should Prison Inmates Be Allowed To Discontinue Treatment For Incurable, Noncommunicable Medical Conditions?, Daniel R. H. Mendelsohn
The Right To Refuse: Should Prison Inmates Be Allowed To Discontinue Treatment For Incurable, Noncommunicable Medical Conditions?, Daniel R. H. Mendelsohn
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does It Really Matter? Conservative Courts In A Conservative Era, Mark A. Graber
Does It Really Matter? Conservative Courts In A Conservative Era, Mark A. Graber
Faculty Scholarship
This essay explores the likelihood that conservative federal courts in the near future will be agents of conservative social change. In particular, the paper assesses whether conservative justices on some issues will support more conservative policies than conservative elected officials are presently willing to enact and whether such judicial decisions will influence public policy. My primary conclusion is that, as long as conservatives remain politically ascendant in the elected branches of government, the Roberts Court is likely to influence American politics at the margins. The new conservative judicial majority is likely to be more libertarian than conservative majorities in the …
Juristocracy In The Trenches: Problem-Solving Judges And Therapeutic Jurisprudence In Drug Treatment Courts And Unified Family Courts, Richard Boldt, Jana Singer
Juristocracy In The Trenches: Problem-Solving Judges And Therapeutic Jurisprudence In Drug Treatment Courts And Unified Family Courts, Richard Boldt, Jana Singer
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privacy And The Criminal Arrestee Or Suspect: In Search Of A Right, In Need Of A Rule, Sadiq Reza
Privacy And The Criminal Arrestee Or Suspect: In Search Of A Right, In Need Of A Rule, Sadiq Reza
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.