Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ACA (1)
- Affordable Care Act (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Beatty v. Gillbanks (1)
- Biotechnologies (1)
-
- Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet (1)
- Breyer (1)
- Candor (1)
- Centers for Common Disease Genomics (1)
- Chimeras (1)
- Citation (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Common law (1)
- Comparative (1)
- Comparativism (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutionalism (1)
- DNA (1)
- Developmental Biology (1)
- Dialogic (1)
- Dialogue (1)
- EPC (1)
- Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network (1)
- European Patent Convention (1)
- Exceptionalism (1)
- Federal Civil Rights Act (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Global Person: Pig-Human Embryos, Personhood, And Precision Medicine, Yvonne Cripps
The Global Person: Pig-Human Embryos, Personhood, And Precision Medicine, Yvonne Cripps
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
Chimeras, in the form of pig-human embryos engineered by CRISPR-Cas9 and other biotechnologies, have been created as potential sources of organs for transplantation. Against that background, and in an era of "precision medicine," this Article examines the concept of the global genetically modified person and asks whether humanness and personhood are being eroded, or finding new boundaries in intellectual property and constitutional law.
First Amendment Investigations And The Inescapable Pragmatism Of The Common Law Of Free Speech, Lawrence Rosenthal
First Amendment Investigations And The Inescapable Pragmatism Of The Common Law Of Free Speech, Lawrence Rosenthal
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Storm In A Teacup: The U.S. Supreme Court’S Use Of Foreign Law, Austen L. Parrish
Storm In A Teacup: The U.S. Supreme Court’S Use Of Foreign Law, Austen L. Parrish
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In this Article, Professor Parrish explores the legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court's use of foreign law in constitutional adjudication. In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court has used foreign law as persuasive authority in a number of highly contentious cases. The backlash has been spirited, with calls for foreign law to be categorically barred from constitutional adjudication, and even for Justices to be impeached if they cite to foreign sources. Last year, the condemnation of comparative constitutionalism reached a high note, as a barrage of scholarship decried the practice as illegitimate and a threat to our national sovereignty. The …
The Constitution And The Subgroup Question, Martha Minow
The Constitution And The Subgroup Question, Martha Minow
Indiana Law Journal
Presented on Nov. 18, 1994, Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington as the 1994 Harris Lecture.
Prohibition Of Lawful Assembly When Opposed By Threat Of Violence
Prohibition Of Lawful Assembly When Opposed By Threat Of Violence
Indiana Law Journal
Constitutional Law Note