Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Assessing The Constitutionality Of Laws That Are Both Content-Based And Content-Neutral: The Emerging Constitutional Calculus, Wilson R. Huhn
Assessing The Constitutionality Of Laws That Are Both Content-Based And Content-Neutral: The Emerging Constitutional Calculus, Wilson R. Huhn
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Shakin' It To The Back Of The Bus: How Parks V. Laface Uses The Artistic Relevance Test To Adjudicate Artistic Content, Mitchell David Greggs
Shakin' It To The Back Of The Bus: How Parks V. Laface Uses The Artistic Relevance Test To Adjudicate Artistic Content, Mitchell David Greggs
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Restraint And Responsibility: Judicial Review Of Campaign Reform, Spencer Overton
Restraint And Responsibility: Judicial Review Of Campaign Reform, Spencer Overton
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On The Fcc's Recent Mass Media Ownership Decision, William Fishman
Comments On The Fcc's Recent Mass Media Ownership Decision, William Fishman
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lessons From A Story Untold: Nike V. Kasky Reconsidered, David C. Vladeck
Lessons From A Story Untold: Nike V. Kasky Reconsidered, David C. Vladeck
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Supreme Court's recent dismissal, apparently on jurisdictional grounds, of the writ of certiorari it had granted to review Nike, Inc. v. Kasky has brought into sharp focus a number of critiques of the commercial speech doctrine - some new, some longstanding. At issue in Nike were communications Nike made to customers, newspaper editors, college presidents and athletic directors, and others responding to allegations that Nike had engaged in, or was complicit in, the mistreatment of foreign workers. Respondent Marc Kasky contended that Nike's communications contained significant misstatements of fact and thus were actionable under California's unfair competition and false …
Note: Get The Balance Right: Finding An Equilibrium Between Charitable Solicitation, Fraud, And The First Amendment In Illinois Ex Rel. Madigan V. Telemarketing Associates, Inc., 538 U.S. 600 (2003), Christopher R. Sullivan
Note: Get The Balance Right: Finding An Equilibrium Between Charitable Solicitation, Fraud, And The First Amendment In Illinois Ex Rel. Madigan V. Telemarketing Associates, Inc., 538 U.S. 600 (2003), Christopher R. Sullivan
William Mitchell Law Review
This Note first examines the history of the relevant law in the areas of fraud, charitable solicitation, and prior restraints. Specifically, it examines the three leading cases on regulation of charitable fundraising speech: Schaumburg, Munson, and Riley. Next, the Note discusses the history and holding of Illinois ex rel. Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates, Inc. Next, this Note will explore the holding in Telemarketing Associates in light of Schaumburg and its progeny. This analysis includes a survey of recent and pending fraud litigation against charities and their fundraisers, and a review of the Federal Trade Commission's “Operation Phoney Philanthropy.” Finally, the …