Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
A Nondeferential Standard For Appellate Review Of State Law Decisions By Federal District Courts
A Nondeferential Standard For Appellate Review Of State Law Decisions By Federal District Courts
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Anti-Formalism In Recent Constitutional Theory, Mark V. Tushnet
Anti-Formalism In Recent Constitutional Theory, Mark V. Tushnet
Michigan Law Review
The focus in constitutional theory on judicial review rests on a much deeper political theory than the phrase "countermajoritarian difficulty" standing alone suggests. Majoritarian or democratic decision making is itself a solution to a set of problems that arise from a particular view of human nature and political action. In this Article, I identify, explicate, and criticize some recent developments in constitutional theory which are of interest to the extent that they reject that view of human nature and politics. I take as my focus important articles by Robert Burt, Robert Cover, Owen Fiss, Frank Michelman, and Cass Sunstein. I …
The Delegation Doctrine: Could The Court Give It Substance?, David Schoenbrod
The Delegation Doctrine: Could The Court Give It Substance?, David Schoenbrod
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this Article demonstrates the need for a new approach to the delegation doctrine. It shows that the Court has failed to articulate a coherent test of improper delegation and that the alternative tests offered by commentators are not sufficient. Part II then sets forth a proposed test of improper delegation. The basic principles of an approach prohibiting delegations of legislative power are outlined and illustrated. This Article does not, however, attempt anything so grand as to suggest a final definition of the doctrine or to pass broadly on the validity of statutes. Such an encompassing analysis is …
The Legitimacy Of Judicial Review In Individual Rights Cases: Michael Perry's Constitutional Theory And Beyond, Daniel O. Conkle
The Legitimacy Of Judicial Review In Individual Rights Cases: Michael Perry's Constitutional Theory And Beyond, Daniel O. Conkle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Nonoriginalist Constitutional Rights And The Problem Of Judicial Finality, Daniel O. Conkle
Nonoriginalist Constitutional Rights And The Problem Of Judicial Finality, Daniel O. Conkle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And The Constitution: The Continuing Debate On Judicial Review, Donald P. Kommers
The Supreme Court And The Constitution: The Continuing Debate On Judicial Review, Donald P. Kommers
Journal Articles
The three books reviewed in this essay are recent contributions to the growing literature of constitutional theory (Michael J. Perry, The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights (New Ha- ven: Yale University Press, 1982); Sotirios A. Barber, On What the Constitution Means (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984); and John Agresto, The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984). They explore important questions about the role of the Supreme Court and the meaning of the Constitution.
Book Review, Pierre Schlag
Framers Intent: The Illegitimate Uses Of History, Pierre Schlag
Framers Intent: The Illegitimate Uses Of History, Pierre Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.