Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Marbury V. Madison, Lord Coke, And Dr. Bonham: Relics Of The Past, Guidelines For The Present—Judicial Review Intransition?, George P. Smith, Ii Jan 1979

Marbury V. Madison, Lord Coke, And Dr. Bonham: Relics Of The Past, Guidelines For The Present—Judicial Review Intransition?, George P. Smith, Ii

Seattle University Law Review

The purpose of this article is to explore the modern significance of Coke's influence as analyzed and interpreted through the famous Bonham's Case and thereby to provide an insight into the development of our own concepts of judicial review, as borrowed from the English, in its original historical legal perspective and as seen through the decision in Marbury v. Madison and applied modernly in the principle case of Baker v. Carr.


Constitutional Law - First Amendment - Release Of Toll Call Billing Records Disclosing Journalists' Confidential Sources Held Not Violate Of Freedom Of The Press And Not To Require Prior Judicial Review, Arthur B. Axelson Jan 1979

Constitutional Law - First Amendment - Release Of Toll Call Billing Records Disclosing Journalists' Confidential Sources Held Not Violate Of Freedom Of The Press And Not To Require Prior Judicial Review, Arthur B. Axelson

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.