Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UC Law SF (38)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (35)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (26)
- Universitas Indonesia (23)
- University of Richmond (12)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (10)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (9)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (8)
- St. Mary's University (8)
- Brigham Young University Law School (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- West Virginia University (6)
- Florida State University College of Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (35)
- Constitutional law (16)
- Due process (7)
- Due Process (6)
- Abortion (5)
-
- Canada's Indians (5)
- Consent (5)
- Equal Protection (5)
- Fetal Research (5)
- International trusteeship (5)
- Schools (5)
- Trusteeship (5)
- Civil Rights (4)
- Damages (4)
- Freedom of speech (4)
- Native Americans (4)
- Separation of powers (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Constitutional History (3)
- Criminal procedure (3)
- Equal protection (3)
- Ethics of Research (3)
- Fathers of Confederation (3)
- Federal Courts (3)
- Informed Consent (3)
- Injunctions (3)
- Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council (3)
- Judicial review (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Macdonald's Constitution (3)
- Publication
-
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (38)
- Supreme Court Case Files (27)
- Villanova Law Review (26)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (23)
- University of Richmond Law Review (12)
-
- Buffalo Law Review (9)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (9)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (8)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (8)
- BYU Law Review (7)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (6)
- West Virginia Law Review (6)
- Florida State University Law Review (5)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (5)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
- American Indian Law Review (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Maryland Law Review (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- Washington Law Review (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 250
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
An Evidence Code: The American Experience, Paul F. Rothstein
An Evidence Code: The American Experience, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Professor Paul Rothstien's opening address at the Conference on Current Trends in Evidence, Dalhousie University, 26th November 1976.
Rothstein discusses the American Evidence Code, the American experience with it, and compares it to a proposed Code that Canada is considering.
Pendidikan Hukum Di Amerika Serikat, Gregory Churchill
Pendidikan Hukum Di Amerika Serikat, Gregory Churchill
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
No abstract provided.
Pembaharuan Pendidikan Hukum, Team Asesmen Pendidikan Hukum
Pembaharuan Pendidikan Hukum, Team Asesmen Pendidikan Hukum
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
No abstract provided.
Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Hukum, Soerjono Soekanto
Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Hukum, Soerjono Soekanto
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
No abstract provided.
Pendidikan Hukum Di Mata Mahasiswa, Arief Taruna
Pendidikan Hukum Di Mata Mahasiswa, Arief Taruna
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
No abstract provided.
Adjudication Of Federal Causes Of Action In State Court, Martin H. Redish, John E. Muench
Adjudication Of Federal Causes Of Action In State Court, Martin H. Redish, John E. Muench
Michigan Law Review
The first section of this article considers the power of state courts to hear federal cases. Since it is now well established that state courts have the constitutional power to adjudicate federal causes of action if Congress so desires, the significant questions concern the method by which the judiciary is to decipher congressional intent. Although the courts have no difficulty where Congress has explicitly addressed the issue of state court jurisdiction, problems do arise in situations where Congress has remained silent on the question. The first section critically examines the traditional criteria employed by the courts for determining congressional intent …
The New Pro-Life Legislation: Patterns And Recommendations., Joseph P. Witherspoon
The New Pro-Life Legislation: Patterns And Recommendations., Joseph P. Witherspoon
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Constitutional Law, David E. Hudson
Constitutional Law, David E. Hudson
Mercer Law Review
As in years past, the bulk of the Georgia appellate court decisions in the area of constitutional law concerned the criminal law aspects of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. A significant although lesser number of constitutional decisions involved civil matters and will also be discussed in this survey.
Buckley V. Valeo, Its Aftermath, And Its Prospects: The Constitutionality Of Government Restraints On Political Campaign Financing, Brice M. Clagett, John R. Bolton
Buckley V. Valeo, Its Aftermath, And Its Prospects: The Constitutionality Of Government Restraints On Political Campaign Financing, Brice M. Clagett, John R. Bolton
Vanderbilt Law Review
The Supreme Court's decision in Buckley v. Valeo' undoubtedly will be the forerunner of many future decisions dealing with the complex area of political campaign finance and thus will exert a profound influence on the structure of American politics. From a broader perspective, the decision significantly applies fundamental constitutional law doctrines concerning the first amendment and separation of powers. Accordingly, a clear understanding of what the Court did and did not do in Buckley is essential to any further legislative or judicial initiatives in the regulation of political activity. This article will examine the Court's holdings in Buckley, describe the …
Constitutional Law-Substantive Due Process- Abortion-Reasonable Statutory Recordkeeping And Reporting Requirements Upheld-Planned Parenthood V. Danforth, James C. Swindler
Constitutional Law-Substantive Due Process- Abortion-Reasonable Statutory Recordkeeping And Reporting Requirements Upheld-Planned Parenthood V. Danforth, James C. Swindler
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases, Laurence M. Hamric, William G. Scott, Mitchell M. Purvis, George M. Kryder, Iii, Richard M. Pitt
Recent Cases, Laurence M. Hamric, William G. Scott, Mitchell M. Purvis, George M. Kryder, Iii, Richard M. Pitt
Vanderbilt Law Review
Laurence M. Hamric
The instant decision demonstrates the inability of the Court, on its own or with the meager guidance provided by Congress, to discern a clear standard by which to measure the propriety of union organizational activity in light of current federal labor and antitrust law. Faced with a fact pattern that did not embody an apparent anticompetitive intent, a classic conspiracy between labor and non-labor entities, or activity clearly unrelated to the legitimate union interest in achieving better wages and working conditions, the Court was forced to abandon the "clear showing" test of Pennington," the"intimately related" test of …
Califano V. Goldfarb, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Califano V. Goldfarb, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Swain V. Pressley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Nixon V. Administrator Of General Services, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Nixon V. Administrator Of General Services, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Wooley V. Maynard, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Trimble V. Gordon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Shaffer V. Heitner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Shaffer V. Heitner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Fiallo V. Bell, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Craig V. Boren, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
General Electric V. Gilbert, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
General Electric V. Gilbert, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Brewer V. Williams, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Brewer V. Williams, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Authority Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Authority Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Ingraham V. Wright, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Ingraham V. Wright, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Maher V. Roe, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Castaneda V. Partida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Castaneda V. Partida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United Jewish Organizations Of Williamsburgh, Inc. V. Carey, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United Jewish Organizations Of Williamsburgh, Inc. V. Carey, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Zacchini V. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Zacchini V. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Vorchheimer V. School District Of Philadelphia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Vorchheimer V. School District Of Philadelphia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Mathews V. Goldfarb, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Mathews V. Goldfarb, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.