Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Kauper's 'Judicial Examination Of The Accused' Forty Years Later—Some Comments On A Remarkable Article, Yale Kamisar
Kauper's 'Judicial Examination Of The Accused' Forty Years Later—Some Comments On A Remarkable Article, Yale Kamisar
Articles
For a long time before Professor Paul Kauper wrote "Judicial Examination of the Accused" in 1932, and for a long time thereafter, the "legal mind" shut out the de facto inquisitorial system that characterized American criminal procedure. Paul Kauper could not look away. He recognized the "naked, ugly facts" (p. 1224) and was determined to do something about them -more than thirty years before Escobedo v. Illinois' or Miranda v. Arizona.2
The Less Restrictive Alternative In Constitutional Adjudication: An Analysis, A Justification, And Some Criteria, Robert M. Bastress, Jr.
The Less Restrictive Alternative In Constitutional Adjudication: An Analysis, A Justification, And Some Criteria, Robert M. Bastress, Jr.
Vanderbilt Law Review
The past two decades have witnessed enormous changes in both substantive constitutional law and the courts' approach to constitutional questions. The frequent application of the doctrine of less restrictive alternatives has been a factor of increasingly significant proportions in effecting these changes. Although the doctrine has long been part of our jurisprudence,' it did not begin to have a serious impact until the Warren Court years, and, despite its widely diversified use today, the concept is almost always applied without discussion. Succinctly and broadly stated, the doctrine requires that a state not employ a specific means to accomplish an admittedly …
Gagnon V. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 (1973), Florida State University Law Review
Gagnon V. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 (1973), Florida State University Law Review
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-DUE PROCESS-REVOCATION OF PROBATION WITHOUT PRIOR HEARING VIOLATES PROBATIONER'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS; NEED FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL AT REVOCATION HEARING TO BE DETERMINED ON CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.
The Conclusive Presumption Doctrine: Equal Process Or Due Protection?, Michigan Law Review
The Conclusive Presumption Doctrine: Equal Process Or Due Protection?, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In Vlandis v. Kline and United States Department of Agriculture v. Murry, decided during its past term, the Supreme Court invoked the conclusive presumption doctrine to invalidate statutory provisions, that restricted access to certain state and federal government benefits. This term, in Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, the Court used the same rationale to strike down school board rules requiring teachers to take maternity leaves without pay. The essence of the doctrine is as follows: When a statutory provision imposes a burden upon a class of individuals for a particular purpose and certain individuals within the burdened class …
Kirby, Biggers, And Ash: Do Any Constitutional Safeguards Remain Against The Danger Of Convicting The Innocent?, Joseph D. Grano
Kirby, Biggers, And Ash: Do Any Constitutional Safeguards Remain Against The Danger Of Convicting The Innocent?, Joseph D. Grano
Michigan Law Review
Even recognizing the danger of misidentification, procedural safeguards, especially constitutional ones, are not readily apparent. Some judges, such as Justice Stewart, find less need for counsel at photographic displays than at lineups; others find an equivalent or even greater need for counsel. Some judges, in approving on-the-scene identifications without counsel, find a guarantee of accuracy in the short interval between the crime and the identification; other judges decry such procedures and find them inherently suggestive. The problem stems directly from the lack of scientific knowledge and inquiry. Therefore, in analyzing the recent identification cases, this Article will draw upon experimental …
Frontiero V. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), Florida State University Law Review
Frontiero V. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), Florida State University Law Review
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law- DUE PROCESS- FEDERAL LAW CONCLUSIVELY PRESUMING SPOUSE OF SERVICEMAN TO BE HIS DEPENDENT WHILE REBUTTABLY PRESUMING SPOUSE OF SERVICEWOMAN NOT TO BE HER DEPENDENT VIOLATES DUE PROCESS GUARANTEE OF FIFTH AMENDMENT.
Toward A Probable Cause Standard In Sentencing: Nickens V. State
Toward A Probable Cause Standard In Sentencing: Nickens V. State
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Right To Counsel And Due Process In Probation Revocation Proceedings: Gagnon V. Scarpelli, Douglas C. Jenkins
The Right To Counsel And Due Process In Probation Revocation Proceedings: Gagnon V. Scarpelli, Douglas C. Jenkins
Cleveland State Law Review
On May 14, 1973, the worst fear of at least one commentator was borne out by the opinion of the Supreme Court in Gagnon v. Scarpelli. Justice Powell, writing for the Court, recognized certain due process rights of the individual who has been convicted and placed on probation. The Court refused to adopt a per se right to representation by counsel as an element of due process in probation revocation proceedings, however. The opinion has left the meaning and importance of due process in grave doubt, has retarded the progression of penal-correctional reform, and has insured a heavy docket for …
Fuentes V. Shevin: The Application Of Constitutional Due Process To The Garageman's Lien In Kentucky, Roger L. Crittenden
Fuentes V. Shevin: The Application Of Constitutional Due Process To The Garageman's Lien In Kentucky, Roger L. Crittenden
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Relief For The Civilly Committed: A Constitutional Right To Treatment, Gary L. Stage
Relief For The Civilly Committed: A Constitutional Right To Treatment, Gary L. Stage
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.