Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Kewajiban Endorser Atas Penganjuran Suatu Produk Pada Media Sosial Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia Dalam Perbandingan Dengan Amerika Serikat, Inggris Dan India, Nurul Ain Mubarikah
Kewajiban Endorser Atas Penganjuran Suatu Produk Pada Media Sosial Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia Dalam Perbandingan Dengan Amerika Serikat, Inggris Dan India, Nurul Ain Mubarikah
"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI
Endorsement of products and services in social media is a lucrative business for celebrities or social media influencers. Producers of goods and services believe that celebrities or social media influencers has the power to influence purchasing decisions of many people. Social media endorsements are not specifically regulated in Indonesian laws and regulations. However, Indonesian Advertising Ethics – 2014 Amendment, compiled by Indonesian Advertising Board, specifies that an endorser is prohibited from using personal social media as an advertising medium to endorse goods and/or services, unless if the endorser clearly mention that it is a paid endorsement. The financial aspect …
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Due Process People V. Scott (Decided June 5, 1996)
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Between Brady Discretion And Brady Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
Between Brady Discretion And Brady Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
The Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland presented prosecutors with new professional challenges. In Brady, the Supreme Court held that the prosecution must provide the defense with any evidence in its possession that could be exculpatory. If the prosecution fails to timely turn over evidence that materially undermines the defendant’s guilt, a reviewing court must grant the defendant a new trial. While determining whether evidence materially undermines a defendant’s guilt may seem like a simple assessment, the real-life application of such a determination can be complicated. The prosecution’s disclosure determination can be complicated under the Brady paradigm because …
Constitutional Law—Why Amending The Consitution To Overrule Citizens United Is The Wrong Way To Fix Campaign Finance In The United States, Zachary Hale
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Balancing Disclosure And Privacy Interests In Campaign Finance, Sarah Harding
Balancing Disclosure And Privacy Interests In Campaign Finance, Sarah Harding
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
The law of campaign finance pits two important First Amendment interests against each other: disclosure and privacy. The Supreme Court has recognized the need to balance these two interests to allow for effective elections and to safeguard individual rights. However, through the years the Court has failed to balance these interests equally, resulting in vacillating decisions that unfairly sacrifice one for the other. From Burroughs v. United States in 1934 to Citizens United v. FEC in 2010, the Court has failed to provide a workable roadmap for legislatures in the creation of campaign finance disclosure laws and for lower courts …
Election Law—Introduction, Jessica A. Levinson
Election Law—Introduction, Jessica A. Levinson
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan
Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
The United States Constitution as well as state procedural rules require prosecutorial authorities to disclose evidence to the defense as a means for ensuring fairness in the prosecution of individuals charged with criminal offenses. When prosecutorial authorities fail to disclose evidence as required, the integrity of the criminal justice system is threatened and the defense is unable to adequately prepare for trial. This threat is illustrated and magnified by the substantiation of prosecutorial misconduct claims in high profile trials where prosecutors have been unable to resist the temptation not to disclose evidence that could damage the prosecution's case, or, where …
Constitutional Law - United States V. Richey: Disclosure Of Tax Information By Former Irs Agent Not Protected By The First Amendment, Christine C. Pagano
Constitutional Law - United States V. Richey: Disclosure Of Tax Information By Former Irs Agent Not Protected By The First Amendment, Christine C. Pagano
Golden Gate University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Helix, Double Standards: Private Matters And Public People, Teneille R. Brown
Double Helix, Double Standards: Private Matters And Public People, Teneille R. Brown
Journal of Health Care Law and Policy
No abstract provided.
Corporate Speech, Securities Regulation, And An Institutional Approach To The First Amendment, Michael R. Siebecker
Corporate Speech, Securities Regulation, And An Institutional Approach To The First Amendment, Michael R. Siebecker
William & Mary Law Review
Does the First Amendment shield politically tinged corporate speech from the compelled disclosure and reporting requirements embedded in the U.S. securities laws? The question arises in the securities regulation context because of an impending jurisprudential train wreck between the Supreme Court's commercial speech doctrine and its approach to corporate political speech. As corporations begin mixing commercial messages with political commentary, First Amendment jurisprudence simply provides insufficient guidance on the role government should play in regulating that speech. Although First Amendment jurisprudence generally counsels against governmental restrictions on corporate political speech without regard to the truth or falsity of the message, …
Corporate Pro-Choice: New York Assumes An Anti-Takover Position, Paula Walter
Corporate Pro-Choice: New York Assumes An Anti-Takover Position, Paula Walter
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Attorney Advertising—Constitutional Right To Advertise In Print Media, Daniel L. Parker
Attorney Advertising—Constitutional Right To Advertise In Print Media, Daniel L. Parker
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Journalist's Privilege In Arkansas, John J. Watkins
The Journalist's Privilege In Arkansas, John J. Watkins
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Dimensions Of A Journalist's Shield—First Amendment Protection For The Constitutionality Of News Sources Against Requests For Court-Ordered Disclosure In Civil Cases, Frank Van Dusen
Seattle University Law Review
This comment suggests a test in civil cases that enables a court to determine if there is a first amendment interest in protecting a source’s confidentiality. If a journalist can demonstrate this interest, then the burden shifts to the litigant seeking disclosure. This comments suggests three criteria through which the litigant must persuade the court that the state’s interest outweighs the first amendment interest. The test suggested by this comment should increase protection for the first amendment interest by decreasing the number of disclosure orders issued and by giving journalists and their confidential sources a basis for predicting in advance …
Reverse Freedom Of Information Act Litigation In A Non-Commercial Setting: The Case Of Professor Doe, Lawrence A. Silver
Reverse Freedom Of Information Act Litigation In A Non-Commercial Setting: The Case Of Professor Doe, Lawrence A. Silver
Cleveland State Law Review
So complex are the questions of what the right of privacy is, and when and how it can be invoked, that special precautions must be taken to prevent an article dealing with it from drifting off into the fascinating but misty realms of metaphysical speculation. This Article will deal with an important issue raised but not answered by the Federal Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts: the rights of a private party who seeks to prevent the federal government from releasing information concerning him.