Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Judicial Confusion And Inconsistency In Handling Juror Misconduct: A New Proposal, Kristen D. Clardy
Judicial Confusion And Inconsistency In Handling Juror Misconduct: A New Proposal, Kristen D. Clardy
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Reaffirming The Right To Pretrial Assistance: The Surprising Little Case Of Fellers V. United States, James K. Tomkovicz
Reaffirming The Right To Pretrial Assistance: The Surprising Little Case Of Fellers V. United States, James K. Tomkovicz
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Grutter And The Passion Of Justice Thomas: A Response To Professor Kearney, Ronald Turner
Grutter And The Passion Of Justice Thomas: A Response To Professor Kearney, Ronald Turner
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Curioser And Curioser: Involuntary Medications And Incompetent Criminal Defendents After Sell V. United States, Dora W. Klein
Curioser And Curioser: Involuntary Medications And Incompetent Criminal Defendents After Sell V. United States, Dora W. Klein
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Media In The Courtroom: Attending, Reporting, Televising Criminal Cases, Paul Marcus
The Media In The Courtroom: Attending, Reporting, Televising Criminal Cases, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Faretta Principle: Self Representation Versus The Right To Counsel, Paul Marcus
The Faretta Principle: Self Representation Versus The Right To Counsel, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
The United States Constitution makes provision for criminal defendants to be represented by counsel. In the federal jurisdiction this principle was vigorously applied, even to indigent persons, very early in the Twentieth Century. The United States Supreme Court, however, was reluctant to impose this requirement on the states except in cases of unusual circumstances where the absence of counsel would have affected the basic fairness of the trial. Finally, in a landmark decision by the Supreme Court, it was held that the right to counsel applies in both federal and state cases. For the past twenty years, federal and state …
The Supreme Court And Press Fashions, Robert Mason
The Supreme Court And Press Fashions, Robert Mason
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.