Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States Constitution (5)
- Freedom of Speech (4)
- Searches and Seizures (4)
- Demonstrations (3)
- Freedom of Religion (3)
-
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (3)
- Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (3)
- Executive Power (2)
- Probable Cause (2)
- Separation of Powers (2)
- Terry v. Ohio (392 U.S. 1 (1968)) (2)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (2)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (2)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Compensation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Freedom of Expression (1)
- International Law (1)
- Judicial Power (1)
- New York (1)
- Police (1)
- Police Discretion (1)
- Police Misconduct (1)
- Police Reform (1)
- Poverty (1)
- President of the United States (1)
- Recognition (1)
- Regulatory Taking (1)
- Right of Privacy (1)
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Ferguson — What Now?, Timothy Zick
The Cost Of Public Protest, Timothy Zick
Zick On Public Protest And Ferguson, Timothy Zick
Rights Speech, Timothy Zick
Rights Speech, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
Freedom of expression has a complex and dynamic relationship with a number of other constitutional rights, including abortion, the right to bear arms, equal protection, the franchise, and religious liberty. This Article discusses one aspect of that relationship. It critically analyzes the regulation of "rights speech" - communications about or concerning the recognition, scope, or exercise of constitutional rights. As illustrative examples, the Article focuses on regulation of speech about abortion and the Second Amendment right to bear arms. Governments frequently manage, structure, and limit how individuals discuss constitutional rights. For example, laws and regulations compel physicians to convey information …
Justifying A Prudential Solution To The Williamson County Ripeness Puzzle, Katherine Mims Crocker
Justifying A Prudential Solution To The Williamson County Ripeness Puzzle, Katherine Mims Crocker
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Future Of The Fourth Amendment: The Problem With Privacy, Poverty And Policing, Kami Chavis Simmons
Future Of The Fourth Amendment: The Problem With Privacy, Poverty And Policing, Kami Chavis Simmons
Faculty Publications
For decades, the reasonable expectation of privacy has been the primary standard by which courts have determined whether a "search" has occurred within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court's recent decision in U.S. v. Jones, however, has reinvigorated the physical trespass doctrine's importance when determining whether there has been a "search" triggering constitutional protection. Recognizing the unpredictability of the reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine and that doctrine's bias against the urban poor, many scholars hope that the Jones opinion may ameliorate the class divide that has developed in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.
This Article argues that while …
The Inverse Relationship Between The Constitutionality And Effectiveness Of New York City "Stop And Frisk", Jeffrey Bellin
The Inverse Relationship Between The Constitutionality And Effectiveness Of New York City "Stop And Frisk", Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
New York City sits at the epicenter of an extraordinary criminal justice phenomenon. While employing aggressive policing tactics, such as “stop and frisk,” on an unprecedented scale, the City dramatically reduced both violent crime and incarceration – with the connections between these developments (if any) hotly disputed. Further clouding the picture, in August 2013, a federal district court ruled the City’s heavy reliance on “stop and frisk” unconstitutional. Popular and academic commentary generally highlights isolated pieces of this complex story, constructing an incomplete vision of the lessons to be drawn from the New York experience. This Article brings together all …
Section 2: Congress & The Obama White House, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: Congress & The Obama White House, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Hobby Lobby And Corporate Social Responsibility: A View From The Right, Alan J. Meese
Hobby Lobby And Corporate Social Responsibility: A View From The Right, Alan J. Meese
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Reply Brief Of Appellant, Gregory Davis, Patricia E. Roberts, Brittany Sadler, Andrew L. Steinberg, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Thomas W. Ports Jr.
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Reply Brief Of Appellant, Gregory Davis, Patricia E. Roberts, Brittany Sadler, Andrew L. Steinberg, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Thomas W. Ports Jr.
Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic
No abstract provided.
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Brief Of Appellant, Gregory Davis, Patricia E. Roberts, Brittany Sadler, Andrew L. Steinberg, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Thomas W. Ports Jr.
United States Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Charles Williams Jr., Defendant-Appellant: Brief Of Appellant, Gregory Davis, Patricia E. Roberts, Brittany Sadler, Andrew L. Steinberg, Tillman J. Breckenridge, Thomas W. Ports Jr.
Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic
No abstract provided.
Hobby Lobby, Corporate Law, And Rfra, Alan J. Meese
Hobby Lobby, Corporate Law, And Rfra, Alan J. Meese
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Hobby Lobby, Corporate Law, And The Theory Of The Firm: Why For-Profit Corporations Are Rfra Persons, Alan J. Meese, Nathan B. Oman
Hobby Lobby, Corporate Law, And The Theory Of The Firm: Why For-Profit Corporations Are Rfra Persons, Alan J. Meese, Nathan B. Oman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Standing Outside Article Iii, Tara Leigh Grove
Standing Outside Article Iii, Tara Leigh Grove
Faculty Publications
The U.S. Supreme Court has insisted that standing doctrine is a “bedrock” requirement only of Article III. Accordingly, both jurists and scholars have assumed that the standing of the executive branch and the legislature, like that of other parties, depends solely on Article III. But I argue that these commentators have overlooked a basic constitutional principle: federal institutions must have affirmative authority for their actions, including the power to bring suit or appeal in federal court. Article III defines the federal “judicial Power” and does not purport to confer any authority on the executive branch or the legislature. Executive and …
Why Arizona V. Gant Is The Wrong Solution To The Warrantless Cell Phone Search Problem, Adam M. Gershowitz
Why Arizona V. Gant Is The Wrong Solution To The Warrantless Cell Phone Search Problem, Adam M. Gershowitz
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
In Sight, It Must Be Right: Judicial Review Of Va Decisions For Reasons And Bases Vs. Clear Error, David E. Boelzner
In Sight, It Must Be Right: Judicial Review Of Va Decisions For Reasons And Bases Vs. Clear Error, David E. Boelzner
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Congress's (Limited) Power To Represent Itself In Court, Tara Leigh Grove, Neal Devins
Congress's (Limited) Power To Represent Itself In Court, Tara Leigh Grove, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
Scholars and jurists have long assumed that, when the executive branch declines to defend a federal statute, Congress may intervene in federal court to defend the law. When invalidating the Defense of Marriage Act, for example, no Supreme Court Justice challenged the authority of the House of Representatives to defend federal laws in at least some circumstances. At the same time, in recent litigation over the Fast and Furious gun-running case, the Department of Justice asserted that the House could not go to court to enforce a subpoena against the executive. In this Article, we seek to challenge both claims. …