Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Probing Into Salinas's Silence: Back To The "Accused Speaks" Model?, Rinat Kitai-Sangero, Yuval Merin
Probing Into Salinas's Silence: Back To The "Accused Speaks" Model?, Rinat Kitai-Sangero, Yuval Merin
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutionalizing Immigration Law On Its Own Path, Anne R. Traum
Constitutionalizing Immigration Law On Its Own Path, Anne R. Traum
Scholarly Works
Courts should insist on heightened procedural protections in immigration adjudication. They should do so under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause rather than by importing Sixth Amendment protections from the criminal context. Traditional judicial oversight and the Due Process Clause provide a better basis than the Sixth Amendment to interpose heightened procedural protections in immigration proceedings, especially those involving removal for a serious criminal conviction. The Supreme Court’s immigration jurisprudence in recent years lends support for this approach. The Court has guarded the availability of judicial review of immigration decisions. It has affirmed that courts are the arbiters of constitutional …
Kelo V. New London: An Opportunity Lost To Rehabilitate The Takings Clause, Christian M. Orme
Kelo V. New London: An Opportunity Lost To Rehabilitate The Takings Clause, Christian M. Orme
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Camping In Lake Tahoe: Does A Temporary Deprivation Of All Beneficial Use Of Land Justify Rejection Of The Categorical Lucas Rule?, Akke Levin
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.