Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Constitutional Law

PDF

University of Baltimore Law

1985

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Commercial Speech — Federal Statute Prohibiting Mailing Of Unsolicited Contraception Advertisements Violates First Amendment As Applied To Accurate Mailings That Contribute To Informed Decision Making. Bolger V. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 103 S. Ct. 2875 (1983), Janet S. Hankin Jan 1985

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Commercial Speech — Federal Statute Prohibiting Mailing Of Unsolicited Contraception Advertisements Violates First Amendment As Applied To Accurate Mailings That Contribute To Informed Decision Making. Bolger V. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 103 S. Ct. 2875 (1983), Janet S. Hankin

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Constitutional Guarantees Of Open Public Proceedings In Criminal Trials Extend To Voir Dire Examination Of Potential Jurors. Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court, 104 S. Ct. 819 (1984), Kevin M. Soper Jan 1985

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Constitutional Guarantees Of Open Public Proceedings In Criminal Trials Extend To Voir Dire Examination Of Potential Jurors. Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court, 104 S. Ct. 819 (1984), Kevin M. Soper

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Sixth Amendment Guarantees Assistance Of Counsel That Is Reasonably Effective And Does Not Prejudice The Fairness Of The Proceeding. Strickland V. Washington, 104 S. Ct. 2052 (1984), Jonathan E. Fink Jan 1985

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Sixth Amendment Guarantees Assistance Of Counsel That Is Reasonably Effective And Does Not Prejudice The Fairness Of The Proceeding. Strickland V. Washington, 104 S. Ct. 2052 (1984), Jonathan E. Fink

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Bivens Actions For Federal Employees In The Aftermath Of Bush V. Lucas: Which Remedies For Whom?, Barry F. Smith Jan 1985

Bivens Actions For Federal Employees In The Aftermath Of Bush V. Lucas: Which Remedies For Whom?, Barry F. Smith

University of Baltimore Law Review

The recognition of the Bivens-style action, or the constitutional tort, has been followed by the Supreme Court's recent assertion that these actions will be unavailable where Congress has established an elaborate remedial scheme that should not be augmented by a judicial remedy. The author of this article posits that this necessary limitation on Bivens actions may produce an ironic result in the area of public personnel. The author reasons that those employees whom Congress has determined warrant no statutory protection may be permitted to pursue more lucrative judicial remedies than those employees whom Congress has sought to protect. The author …


Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Roadside Sobriety Tests May Not Be Administered By Law Enforcement Officials Without Probable Cause To Believe The Defendant Was Driving While Intoxicated. People V. Carlson, 677 P.2d 310 (Colo. 1984), Elena A. Rodney Jan 1985

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Roadside Sobriety Tests May Not Be Administered By Law Enforcement Officials Without Probable Cause To Believe The Defendant Was Driving While Intoxicated. People V. Carlson, 677 P.2d 310 (Colo. 1984), Elena A. Rodney

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Constitutional Law — First Amendment — Regulation Prohibiting Sleeping In National Parks Upheld As A Valid Time, Place, And Manner Regulation Regardless Of Whether Sleeping Is Speech. Clark V. Community For Creative Non-Violence, 104 S. Ct. 3065 (1984), Susan H. Hickes Jan 1985

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — First Amendment — Regulation Prohibiting Sleeping In National Parks Upheld As A Valid Time, Place, And Manner Regulation Regardless Of Whether Sleeping Is Speech. Clark V. Community For Creative Non-Violence, 104 S. Ct. 3065 (1984), Susan H. Hickes

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Constitutional Law — In Personam Jurisdiction — Nonresident Insurer's Solicitation Of Modification To Insurance Contract Provides Sufficient Minimum Contact With Forum State To Satisfy Due Process Jurisdictional Requirements. August V. Hba Life Insurance Co., 734 F.2d 168 (4th Cir. 1984), Elizabeth Suzan Vanlaningham-Miller Jan 1985

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — In Personam Jurisdiction — Nonresident Insurer's Solicitation Of Modification To Insurance Contract Provides Sufficient Minimum Contact With Forum State To Satisfy Due Process Jurisdictional Requirements. August V. Hba Life Insurance Co., 734 F.2d 168 (4th Cir. 1984), Elizabeth Suzan Vanlaningham-Miller

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Standing — Parents Of Black Children Attending Public Schools Undergoing Desegregation Lack Standing To Challenge Allegedly Ineffective Irs Procedures Designed To Limit Tax-Exempt Status To Racially Nondiscriminatory Private Schools. Allen V. Wright, 104 S. Ct. 3315 (1984), Susan D. Cobun Jan 1985

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Standing — Parents Of Black Children Attending Public Schools Undergoing Desegregation Lack Standing To Challenge Allegedly Ineffective Irs Procedures Designed To Limit Tax-Exempt Status To Racially Nondiscriminatory Private Schools. Allen V. Wright, 104 S. Ct. 3315 (1984), Susan D. Cobun

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.


Casenotes: New Trials — Criminal Procedure — Constitutional Law — New Trial Not Warranted Unless Newly Discovered Evidence Satisfies Threshold Requirement Of Materiality To The Outcome Of The Case. Stevenson V. State, 299 Md. 297, 473 A.2d 450 (1984), Nicole Porter Jan 1985

Casenotes: New Trials — Criminal Procedure — Constitutional Law — New Trial Not Warranted Unless Newly Discovered Evidence Satisfies Threshold Requirement Of Materiality To The Outcome Of The Case. Stevenson V. State, 299 Md. 297, 473 A.2d 450 (1984), Nicole Porter

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.