Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Taking Care With Text: "The Laws" Of The Take Care Clause Do Not Include The Constitution, And There Is No Autonomous Presidential Power Of Constitutional Interpretation, George Mader
Faculty Scholarship
“Departmentalism” posits that each branch of the federal government has an independent power of constitutional interpretation—all branches share the power and need not defer to one another in the exercise of their interpretive powers. As regards the Executive Branch, the textual basis for this interpretive autonomy is that the Take Care Clause requires the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” and the Supremacy Clause includes the Constitution in “the supreme Law of the Land.” Therefore, the President is to execute the Constitution as a law. Or so the common argument goes. The presidential oath to “execute …
The Connotation/Denotation Distinction In Constitutional Interpretation, Christopher Birch
The Connotation/Denotation Distinction In Constitutional Interpretation, Christopher Birch
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Why The Reagan Administration Resists Radical Transformation Of The Constitution, Gary C. Leedes
Why The Reagan Administration Resists Radical Transformation Of The Constitution, Gary C. Leedes
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Disestablished Religion In Pennsylvania And Kentucky: A Study In Constitutional Interpretation, Kenneth S. Gallant
Disestablished Religion In Pennsylvania And Kentucky: A Study In Constitutional Interpretation, Kenneth S. Gallant
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.