Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Cooper v. Aaron; American federalism; civil rights; federal-state relationships; New York v. United States (1992); Printz v. United States (1996); judicial supremacy; types of federalism; federal commandeering; separation of powers; (2)
- Cooper v. Aaron; judicial supremacy; Little Rock school desegregation; Supreme Court and minority rights; judicial activism; right to contract; American federalism; US Supreme Court; rule of law; rule of the Supreme Court; (2)
- Death penalty (2)
-
- Death penalty appeals (2)
- Due process (2)
- Right to record (2)
- Anders v. California; no-merit appeals; right of appellate representation for indigent criminal defendants; appellate criminal defense; withdrawal from no-merit appeals; reforming Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(j); (1)
- Ark. R. Crim. P. 17.1 (1)
- Arkansas constable (1)
- Arkansas constabulary (1)
- Attorney advertising (1)
- Automatic death penalty (1)
- Body cameras (1)
- Body-cam (1)
- Bowers v. Hardwick (1)
- Brady (1)
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
- Buckley v. Fitzsimmons (1)
- CLEAR (1)
- CODIS (1)
- Capital punishment delays (1)
- Cellphones (1)
- Citizen (1)
- Civil liability of law enforcement (1)
- Commerce Clause; constitutional law; Violence Against Women's Act; interstate commerce; "substantial effects" test; "rational basis" standard; United States v. Lopez; Gun Free School Zones Act (1)
- Commercial speech exception (1)
- Common law (1)
- Communications technology (1)
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 30 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Constitutional Law—Filling The Gap: The Need For Legislative Action To Protect The Right To Record Police In The Age Of Citizen Journalism, Madalyn J. Goolsby
Constitutional Law—Filling The Gap: The Need For Legislative Action To Protect The Right To Record Police In The Age Of Citizen Journalism, Madalyn J. Goolsby
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Preserving Dignity: The Due Process Restriction On Shackling Criminal Defendants Should Also Apply To Non-Jury Proceedings, Shelby Shelton
Constitutional Law—Preserving Dignity: The Due Process Restriction On Shackling Criminal Defendants Should Also Apply To Non-Jury Proceedings, Shelby Shelton
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper V. Aaron: The First In The Trifecta Of Modern American Federalism Cases, Ronald L. Nelson
Cooper V. Aaron: The First In The Trifecta Of Modern American Federalism Cases, Ronald L. Nelson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper V. Aaron: The First In The Trifecta Of Modern American Federalism Cases, Ronald L. Nelson
Cooper V. Aaron: The First In The Trifecta Of Modern American Federalism Cases, Ronald L. Nelson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper Supremacy, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Cooper Supremacy, Rebecca E. Zietlow
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper Supremacy, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Cooper Supremacy, Rebecca E. Zietlow
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment And The Police In The Digital Age, Kermit V. Lipez
The First Amendment And The Police In The Digital Age, Kermit V. Lipez
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Dissecting The Hybrid Rights Exception: Should It Be Expanded Or Rejected?, David H. Hudson Jr., Emily H. Harvey
Dissecting The Hybrid Rights Exception: Should It Be Expanded Or Rejected?, David H. Hudson Jr., Emily H. Harvey
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nearing Thirty Years: The Burger Court, Strickland V. Washington, And The Parameters Of The Right To Counsel, Joshua Kastenberg
Nearing Thirty Years: The Burger Court, Strickland V. Washington, And The Parameters Of The Right To Counsel, Joshua Kastenberg
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Sixth Amendment—Braving Confrontation: Arkansas’S Progressive Position Regarding Criminal Defendants’ Confrontation Rights At Sentencing, Cassie R. Howell
Constitutional Law—Sixth Amendment—Braving Confrontation: Arkansas’S Progressive Position Regarding Criminal Defendants’ Confrontation Rights At Sentencing, Cassie R. Howell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan
Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
The United States Constitution as well as state procedural rules require prosecutorial authorities to disclose evidence to the defense as a means for ensuring fairness in the prosecution of individuals charged with criminal offenses. When prosecutorial authorities fail to disclose evidence as required, the integrity of the criminal justice system is threatened and the defense is unable to adequately prepare for trial. This threat is illustrated and magnified by the substantiation of prosecutorial misconduct claims in high profile trials where prosecutors have been unable to resist the temptation not to disclose evidence that could damage the prosecution's case, or, where …
The Slow Wheels Of Furman's Machinery Of Death, Brent E. Newton
The Slow Wheels Of Furman's Machinery Of Death, Brent E. Newton
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Sober Second Thought, Andrew H. Schapiro
A Sober Second Thought, Andrew H. Schapiro
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of State And Local Laws Targeting Immigrants, Karla Mari Mckanders
The Constitutionality Of State And Local Laws Targeting Immigrants, Karla Mari Mckanders
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
If The Constable Blunders, Does The County Pay?: Liability Under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Andrew Fulkerson
If The Constable Blunders, Does The County Pay?: Liability Under Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Andrew Fulkerson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—First Amendment And Freedom Of Thought—Banishing Sex Offenders: Seventh Circuit Upholds Sex Offender's Ban From Public Parks After Thinking Obscene Thoughts About Children. Doe V. City Of Lafayette, 377 F.3d 757 (7th Cir. 2004)., Elizabeth Cloud
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—The Fourth Amendment Challenge To Dna Sampling Of Arrestees Pursuant To The Justice For All Act Of 2004: A Proposed Modification To The Traditional Fourth Amendment Test Of Reasonableness, Kimberly A. Polanco
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence—Sixth Amendment And The Confrontation Clause—Testimonial Trumps Reliable: The United States Supreme Court Reconsiders Its Approach To The Confrontation Clause. Crawford V. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)., Kristen Sluyter
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Examination And Analylsis Of The Equity And Adequacy Concepts Of Constitutional Challenges To State Education Finance Distribution Formulas, R. Craig Wood, Bruce D. Baker
An Examination And Analylsis Of The Equity And Adequacy Concepts Of Constitutional Challenges To State Education Finance Distribution Formulas, R. Craig Wood, Bruce D. Baker
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arkansas's Entry Into The Not-So-New Judicial Federalism, Ka Tina R. Hodge
Arkansas's Entry Into The Not-So-New Judicial Federalism, Ka Tina R. Hodge
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Of Arkansas Rule 4-3(J): No-Merit Briefs In Arkansas And The Need To Amend The Rule, Jeffrey A. Weber
Supreme Court Of Arkansas Rule 4-3(J): No-Merit Briefs In Arkansas And The Need To Amend The Rule, Jeffrey A. Weber
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Commerce Clause—Violence Against Women Act's Civil Rights Remedy Exceeds Congress's Powers To Regulate Interstate Commerce. United States V. Morrison, 120 S. Ct. 1740 (2000)., Jennifer L. Wethington
Constitutional Law—Commerce Clause—Violence Against Women Act's Civil Rights Remedy Exceeds Congress's Powers To Regulate Interstate Commerce. United States V. Morrison, 120 S. Ct. 1740 (2000)., Jennifer L. Wethington
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Insane" Contradiction Of Singleton V. Norris: Forced Medication In A Death Row Inmate's Medical Interest Which Happens To Facilitate His Execution, Rebecca A. Miller-Rice
The "Insane" Contradiction Of Singleton V. Norris: Forced Medication In A Death Row Inmate's Medical Interest Which Happens To Facilitate His Execution, Rebecca A. Miller-Rice
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
It Is Not Right Under The Constitution To Stop And Frisk Minority People Because They Don't Look Right, L. Darnell Weeden
It Is Not Right Under The Constitution To Stop And Frisk Minority People Because They Don't Look Right, L. Darnell Weeden
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prosecutorial Misconduct In Closing Argument In Arkansas Criminal Trials, J. Thomas Sullivan
Prosecutorial Misconduct In Closing Argument In Arkansas Criminal Trials, J. Thomas Sullivan
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Supreme Court Upholds Thirty-Day Moratorium On Lawyers' Direct Mail Solicitation Of Accident Victims, Mark W. Hodge
Constitutional Law—Supreme Court Upholds Thirty-Day Moratorium On Lawyers' Direct Mail Solicitation Of Accident Victims, Mark W. Hodge
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Supreme Court Invalidates Federal Gun-Free School Zones Act. United States V. Lopez, 115 S. Ct. 1624 (1995)., John M. Scott
Constitutional Law—Supreme Court Invalidates Federal Gun-Free School Zones Act. United States V. Lopez, 115 S. Ct. 1624 (1995)., John M. Scott
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Goodbye Grady! Blockburger Wins The Double Jeopardy Rematch. United States V. Dixon, 113 S. Ct. 2849 (1993)., Phillip Green
Constitutional Law—Goodbye Grady! Blockburger Wins The Double Jeopardy Rematch. United States V. Dixon, 113 S. Ct. 2849 (1993)., Phillip Green
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Miranda Comes Out From Under A Stone: In Withrow V. Williams, The Supreme Court Declines To Extend The Rule From Stone V. Powell To Preclude Federal Courts From Hearing A State Prisoner's Habeas Corpus Petition Based On An Alleged Violation Of The Prisoner's Miranda Rights, Marcus N. Bozeman
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why The Reagan Administration Resists Radical Transformation Of The Constitution, Gary C. Leedes
Why The Reagan Administration Resists Radical Transformation Of The Constitution, Gary C. Leedes
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.