Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Constitutional Law

PDF

Selected Works

1983

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Medicine And Human Rights: Emerging Substantive Standards And Procedural Protections For Medical Decision-Making Within The American Family, Charles Baron Aug 2013

Medicine And Human Rights: Emerging Substantive Standards And Procedural Protections For Medical Decision-Making Within The American Family, Charles Baron

Charles H. Baron

Also appears in The Resolution of Family Conflict: Comparative Legal Perspectives, edited by John M. Eekelaar and Sanford N. Katz, 575-610. Toronto: Butterworths, 1984.

Go to article

The Independence Of Canada, Brian Slattery Dec 1982

The Independence Of Canada, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms - Override Clauses Under Section 33 - Whether Subject To Judicial Review Under Section 1, Brian Slattery Dec 1982

Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms - Override Clauses Under Section 33 - Whether Subject To Judicial Review Under Section 1, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Medicine And Human Rights: Emerging Substantive Standards And Procedural Protections For Medical Decision-Making Within The American Family, Charles H. Baron Dec 1982

Medicine And Human Rights: Emerging Substantive Standards And Procedural Protections For Medical Decision-Making Within The American Family, Charles H. Baron

Charles H. Baron

Also appears in The Resolution of Family Conflict: Comparative Legal Perspectives, edited by John M. Eekelaar and Sanford N. Katz, 575-610. Toronto: Butterworths, 1984.

Go to article

The Independence Of Canada, Brian Slattery Dec 1982

The Independence Of Canada, Brian Slattery

Brian Slattery

Canada is in independent state and has been for many years. Its sovereign status has long been acknowledged by the international community and the courts. So the constitutional manoeuvres that culminated in the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982, by the British Parliament, must strike any observer as a somewhat puzzling series of events. How can we explain the fact that a sovereign state should consider itself bound to employ the legislature of another sovereign state to secure for itself a new constitution? Underlying this question are a number of fundamental issues going to the foundations of the Canadian legal …

Go to article