Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (3)
- Burkean Conservatism (1)
- Communications Act of 1934 (1)
- Conservative Defense (1)
- Constitution (1)
-
- Deregulation (1)
- Edmund Burke (1)
- Electoral college (1)
- Electoral legitimacy (1)
- FCC (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Filtering Software (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (1)
- Free Speech Clause (1)
- Gay Civil Rights (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Government (1)
- Homophobia (1)
- Internet Access (1)
- Marketplace of ideas (1)
- Memetic replication (1)
- Nondelegation Doctrine (1)
- Originalist Decision (1)
- Politics (1)
- Public Interest Standard (1)
- Public Libraries (1)
- Redistricting (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Religious liberty (1)
- Represenation (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Public Interest Standard: Is It Too Indeterminate To Be Constitutional?, Randolph J. May
The Public Interest Standard: Is It Too Indeterminate To Be Constitutional?, Randolph J. May
Federal Communications Law Journal
This Article argues that the congressional delegation of public interest authority to the FCC likely violates the nondelegation doctrine that inheres in the constitutional separation of powers scheme and that, even if the courts do not hold the public interest delegation unconstitutional, Congress should revise the Communications Act to set forth more specific guidance for the FCC. In today’s environment of “convergence,” in which competition is flourishing across communications sectors, Congress should not shirk its responsibility to establish fundamental policy for an industry that contributes so much to the overall health of our economy. This Article argues that Congress should …
A Conservative Defense Of Romer V. Evans, Dale Carpenter
A Conservative Defense Of Romer V. Evans, Dale Carpenter
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Filth, Filtering, And The First Amendment: Ruminations On Public Libraries’ Use Of Internet Filtering Software, Bernard W. Bell
Filth, Filtering, And The First Amendment: Ruminations On Public Libraries’ Use Of Internet Filtering Software, Bernard W. Bell
Federal Communications Law Journal
Traditionally, whenever the government has sought to regulate speech, analysis of its action focused on conventional issues, such as the type of forum involved, whether the government acted in a regulatory or a proprietary role, and whether the regulation could be defined as a prior restraint. With the advent of the Internet and the opportunity for the widespread dissemination of viewpoints, however, new issues have arisen. This Article focuses on the complex questions public libraries face when filtering material, usually of a sexually explicit nature, from the public using filtering software. This Article contends that public libraries require a unique …
The Free Exercise Clause: How Redundant, And Why?, Daniel O. Conkle
The Free Exercise Clause: How Redundant, And Why?, Daniel O. Conkle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article responds to Professor Mark Tushnet's article, "The Redundant Free Exercise Clause?" Although its analysis and specific conclusions are distinctive, the article reaches a general conclusion similar to Tushnet's - namely, that the contemporary Free Exercise Clause is largely redundant, in that it provides little protection that is not afforded independently by other First Amendment doctrines. The article first contends that the core principle of the contemporary Free Exercise Clause, the nondiscrimination requirement of Employment Division v. Smith, might be subsumed, perhaps entirely, within the free speech principle that disfavors content discrimination. To that extent, the Free Exercise Clause …
Are We Buyers Or Hosts? A Memetic Approach To The First Amendment, Jeffrey E. Stake
Are We Buyers Or Hosts? A Memetic Approach To The First Amendment, Jeffrey E. Stake
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The First Amendment is often analyzed using the metaphor of the marketplace of ideas. Making use of memetic analysis, this article suggests that ideas should not be treated as inert products that we choose but as living things that sometimes exert some influence over their environment. Some of the ideas are more adept at surviving than others, and the ones that survive will not necessarily be good for humans. To account for the ability of some memes to replicate dangerously, the First Amendment should be read to allow governments to punish a speaker who advocates or threatens physical injury (other …
The Electoral College, The Right To Vote, And Our Federalism: A Comment On A Lasting Institution, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
The Electoral College, The Right To Vote, And Our Federalism: A Comment On A Lasting Institution, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The Electoral College has been subject to a constant barrage of criticism. This raises an obvious question: how has the College managed to survive despite its lack of popularity, its opacity and its generally controversial nature?
Commentators look to the wisdom and staying power of the founding generation as well as to the force of history and tradition. In this Article, we look carefully at a third possibility. That is, we look to the foundation of our political structure and the nature of our democratic commitments.
In this vein, we are particularly intrigued by the question of electoral legitimacy. To …
Challenges To Racial Redistricting In The New Millennium: Hunt V. Cromartie As A Case Study, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Challenges To Racial Redistricting In The New Millennium: Hunt V. Cromartie As A Case Study, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.