Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- American University Washington College of Law (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- William & Mary Law School (6)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (5)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (4)
-
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (4)
- California Western School of Law (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Selected Works (2)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- USC Gould School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (12)
- Affirmative action (5)
- Race (5)
- Sex discrimination (5)
- Sexual harassment (5)
-
- Title VII (5)
- ADEA (4)
- Affirmative Action (4)
- Critical race theory (4)
- Diversity (4)
- Employment law (4)
- Sexual orientation (4)
- Civil Rights (3)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (3)
- Civil rights (3)
- Colorblindness (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Equal protection (3)
- Gender and law (3)
- History (3)
- LGBT (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Racism (3)
- Same-sex marriage (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- United States v. Virginia (3)
- Women (3)
- ADA (2)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (2)
- Age discrimination (2)
- Publication
-
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (11)
- Faculty Scholarship (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Faculty Articles (4)
-
- UF Law Faculty Publications (4)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (4)
- Articles (3)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (3)
- Oklahoma Law Review (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Supreme Court Preview (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Angela P Harris (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Circles: Buffalo Women's Journal of Law and Social Policy (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Journal Publications (1)
- Justin Schwartz (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Mark Spiegel (1)
- Mary L. Dudziak (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 87
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Fax: The White House Office Of The Press Secretary December 8, 1997, The White House
Fax: The White House Office Of The Press Secretary December 8, 1997, The White House
Saffy Collection - All Textual Materials
Memorandum for the Secretary of State. A fax disseminate the “Presidential determination on waiver and certification of statutory provisions regarding the Palestine Liberation Organization”.
Hoodwink'd By Custom: The Exclusion Of Women From Juries In Eighteenth-Century English Law And Literature, Judy M. Cornett
Hoodwink'd By Custom: The Exclusion Of Women From Juries In Eighteenth-Century English Law And Literature, Judy M. Cornett
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Section 2: Moot Court, Piscataway Township Board Of Education V. Taxman, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: Moot Court, Piscataway Township Board Of Education V. Taxman, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: The Court And Race Relations, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: The Court And Race Relations, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Wagging The Dog--If The State Of Hawaii Accepts Same-Sex Marriage Will Other States Have To?: An Examination Of Conflict Of Laws And Escape Devices , Rebecaa S. Paige
Wagging The Dog--If The State Of Hawaii Accepts Same-Sex Marriage Will Other States Have To?: An Examination Of Conflict Of Laws And Escape Devices , Rebecaa S. Paige
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Gender Equality And Single-Sex Education. United States V. Virginia, 116 S. Ct. 2264 (1996)., Heather Larkin Eason
Constitutional Law—Gender Equality And Single-Sex Education. United States V. Virginia, 116 S. Ct. 2264 (1996)., Heather Larkin Eason
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Supervisor" Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment Claims, Liability Insurance, And The Trend Towards Negligence, Amanda D. Smith
"Supervisor" Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment Claims, Liability Insurance, And The Trend Towards Negligence, Amanda D. Smith
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
A lack of settled standards for determining liability in supervisor hostile environment sexual harassment lawsuits combined with similar uncertainty in the context of employer liability insurance coverage has resulted in increased litigation in this area. This Note argues that the current predominant standard in the employer liability context, which is based on negligence principle should be rejected in favor of an apparent authority standard, which more appropriately strikes a balance between encouraging employers to identify harassing behaviors and exonerating them from liability when they do so and take appropriate remedial action. It further argues that in order to develop effective …
Diversity: The Red Herring Of Equal Protection, Sharon E. Rush
Diversity: The Red Herring Of Equal Protection, Sharon E. Rush
UF Law Faculty Publications
Couching the constitutional inquiry in cases like Bakke and VMI in the context of integration also puts in perspective the diversity justification. Affirmative action policies are constitutional because they integrate state programs. Integration on the basis of race and sex also diversifies state programs. In contrast, attempts to justify sex-segregation in state programs by arguing the policy promotes diversity is irrelevant to an equal protection analysis. Voluntarily created all-female schools should be constitutional because they promote the equal citizenship of women without damaging the equal citizenship stature of men. This is true for voluntarily race-segregated programs for minorities; as well. …
Modern Discrimination Theory And The National Labor Relations Act, Rebecca H. White
Modern Discrimination Theory And The National Labor Relations Act, Rebecca H. White
Scholarly Works
This Article explores the concept of discrimination under the NLRA [National Labor Relations Act]. Specifically, it examines discrimination under the statute through the lens of Title VII, an approach that brings a fresh perspective to doctrine long considered settled. The purpose of this comparison is to explore the extent to which Title VII's discrimination concepts make sense under the NLRA. This analysis focuses on three specific areas. First, it examines discrimination cases under section 8(a)(1), concluding that the lower courts are wrong to apply Title VII concepts and to insist that without disparate treatment of union activities, no unlawful discrimination …
The Little Rock Crisis And Foreign Affairs: Race, Resistance, And The Image Of American Democracy, Mary L. Dudziak
The Little Rock Crisis And Foreign Affairs: Race, Resistance, And The Image Of American Democracy, Mary L. Dudziak
Mary L. Dudziak
When President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock, Arkansas to enforce a school desegregation order at Central High School in the fall of 1957, more than racial equality was at issue. The image of American democracy was at stake. The Little Rock crisis played out on a world stage, as news media around the world covered the crisis. During the weeks of impasse leading up to Eisenhower's dramatic intervention, foreign critics questioned how the United States could argue that its democratic system of government was a model for others to follow when racial segregation was tolerated in …
Race, Class, And Gender Essentialism In Tax Literature: The Joint Return, Dorothy A. Brown
Race, Class, And Gender Essentialism In Tax Literature: The Joint Return, Dorothy A. Brown
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Psychosocial Risks Of Storing And Using Human Tissues In Research, Jon F. Merz
Psychosocial Risks Of Storing And Using Human Tissues In Research, Jon F. Merz
RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Dr. Merz argues that genetics technology makes it more compelling that researchers plan more carefully for the collection and disposition of information derived from subjects' tissues and blood.
The Current Assault On Constitutional Rights And Civil Liberties: Origins And Approaches, Nadine Strossen
The Current Assault On Constitutional Rights And Civil Liberties: Origins And Approaches, Nadine Strossen
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
More Than A Congressional Joke: A Fresh Look At The Legislative History Of Sex Discrimination Of The 1964 Civil Rights Act, Robert C. Bird
More Than A Congressional Joke: A Fresh Look At The Legislative History Of Sex Discrimination Of The 1964 Civil Rights Act, Robert C. Bird
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Women's, Men's And Children's Equalities: Some Reflections And Uncertainties, Nancy E. Dowd
Women's, Men's And Children's Equalities: Some Reflections And Uncertainties, Nancy E. Dowd
UF Law Faculty Publications
One of the most striking ideas that Edward J. McCaffery suggests in Taxing Women is that equality, of the right sort, must be thought of in gendered terms. We must relinquish the idea that we can find or declare some neutral principle that will achieve the goal of equality, particularly with respect to the relationship between work and family, because the social context makes it impossible. Rather, we need to devise gender-specific strategies to achieve equality, even if they are couched in gender-neutral language. In my recent work examining single parent families, I have come to much the same conclusion: …
The Use Of Self-Regulation To Curb Discrimination And Sexual Harassment In The Legal Profession, Joan Brockman
The Use Of Self-Regulation To Curb Discrimination And Sexual Harassment In The Legal Profession, Joan Brockman
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Many law societies in Canada have responded to studies documenting gender bias and sexual harassment in the legal profession by introducing anti-discrimination rules. The Law Society of British Columbia introduced anti-discrimination rules in 1993. This article discusses the attitudes of a stratified random sample of lawyers (50 women and 50 men) called to the Bar in British Columbia between 1986 and 1990, gathered through in-depth interviews conducted in 1993-94. It addresses the question of whether they think the Law Society's rules prohibiting discrimination and sexual harassment will be effective. The article also raises some questions about the role of self-regulation …
The Equal Rights Amendment: Why The Era Remains Legally Viable And Properly Before The States, Allison L. Held, Sheryl L. Herndon, Danielle M. Stager
The Equal Rights Amendment: Why The Era Remains Legally Viable And Properly Before The States, Allison L. Held, Sheryl L. Herndon, Danielle M. Stager
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Including Gender In Bias Crime Statutes: Feminist And Evolutionary Perspectives, Katherine Chen
Including Gender In Bias Crime Statutes: Feminist And Evolutionary Perspectives, Katherine Chen
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
The Devil And The One Drop Rule: Racial Categories, African Americans, And The U.S. Census, Christine B. Hickman
The Devil And The One Drop Rule: Racial Categories, African Americans, And The U.S. Census, Christine B. Hickman
Michigan Law Review
For generations, the boundaries of the African-American race have been formed by a rule, informally known as the "one drop rule," which, in its colloquial definition, provides that one drop of Black blood makes a person Black. In more formal, sociological circles, the rule is known as a form of "hypodescent" and its meaning remains basically the same: anyone with a known Black ancestor is considered Black. Over the generations, this rule has not only shaped countless lives, it has created the African-American race as we know it today, and it has defined not just the history of this race …
Romer V. Evans And Democracy's Domain, Jane S. Schacter
Romer V. Evans And Democracy's Domain, Jane S. Schacter
Vanderbilt Law Review
As we gather at this Symposium to probe the definition of democracy in the coming century, it seems fitting to note that we are continuing a very old political conversation rather than initiating a new one. The meaning of democracy has long been contested. One of the most vexing aspects of the debate has always centered on whether and how to limit the majority's prerogative to act in ways that disadvantage minorities. Viewed from a different angle, the question is how to configure the relationship between majority preferences and equality norms. It is the basic dilemma of democratic equality: What …
Critical Race Praxis: Race Theory And Political Lawyering Practice In Post-Civil Rights America, Eric K. Yamamoto
Critical Race Praxis: Race Theory And Political Lawyering Practice In Post-Civil Rights America, Eric K. Yamamoto
Michigan Law Review
At the end of the twentieth century, the legal status of Chinese Americans in San Francisco's public schools turns on a requested judicial finding that a desegregation order originally designed to dismantle a system subordinating nonwhites now invidiously discriminates against Chinese Americans. Brian Ho, Patrick Wong, and Hilary Chen, plaintiffs in Ho v. San Francisco Unified School District, represent "all [16,000] children of Chinese descent" eligible to attend San Francisco's public schools. Their high-profile suit, filed by small-firm attorneys, challenges the validity of a 1983 judicial consent decree desegregating San Francisco's schools. Approved in response to an NAACP class action …
Foreword: "Racialism" And Reason, Frank I. Michelman
Foreword: "Racialism" And Reason, Frank I. Michelman
Michigan Law Review
Clueless, I am not; but still I can wonder why I, of all people, was recruited to write a foreword for this symposium - sight unseen, before its component papers had even been submitted. Neither legal representation nor the teaching of it has ever been for me a main activity or focus of scholarly reflection. Although I have written occasionally about race - in defense of busing, on the side of affirmative action - no one could mistake me for a critical race theorist. I am the original-model imperial scholar, as of last report only partially redeemed. "Liberal" is the …
The Underrepresentation Of Minorities In The Legal Profession: A Critical Race Theorist's Perspective, Alex M. Johnson Jr.
The Underrepresentation Of Minorities In The Legal Profession: A Critical Race Theorist's Perspective, Alex M. Johnson Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Over the last four years, I have taught a course in Critical Race Theory at the University of Virginia School of Law three times. Although each course is different, given the interplay between the teacher and the students and the integration of new developments into the course, there has been one constant subject that the students and I address: Of what import is the development of Critical Race Theory for the legal profession and larger society? Can Critical Race Theory have a positive or any effect for those outside legal academia? This article represents an attempt to explore that question …
Lynching Ethics: Toward A Theory Of Racialized Defenses, Anthony V. Alfieri
Lynching Ethics: Toward A Theory Of Racialized Defenses, Anthony V. Alfieri
Michigan Law Review
So much depends upon a rope in Mobile, Alabama. To hang Michael Donald, Henry Hays and James "Tiger" Knowles tied up "a piece of nylon rope about twenty feet long, yellow nylon." They borrowed the rope from Frank Cox, Hays's brother-in-law. Cox "went out in the back" of his mother's "boatshed, or something like that, maybe it was in the lodge." He "got a rope," climbed into the front seat of Hays's Buick Wildcat, and handed it to Knowles sitting in the back seat. So much depends upon a noose. Knowles "made a hangman's noose out of the rope," thirteen …
Toward Respectful Representation: Some Thoughts On Selling Same-Sex Marriage, Marc A. Fajer
Toward Respectful Representation: Some Thoughts On Selling Same-Sex Marriage, Marc A. Fajer
Articles
No abstract provided.
"Substantially Limited" Protection From Disability Discrimination: The Special Treatment Model And Misconstructions Of The Definition Of Disability, Robert Burgdorf
"Substantially Limited" Protection From Disability Discrimination: The Special Treatment Model And Misconstructions Of The Definition Of Disability, Robert Burgdorf
Journal Articles
DISABILITY' nondiscrimination laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA),2 and the disability rights movement which spawned them have, at their core, a central premise that is both simple and profound. That premise is that people denominated as "disabled" are just people, not different in any critical way from other people. Paradoxically, commentators, enforcement agencies and the courts, with manifest good intentions, have frequently interpreted and applied these laws in ways that reinforce a diametrically opposite premise-that people with disabilities are significantly different, special and need exceptional status and protection, One is reminded of Justice Brandeis's admonition …
Criminal Procedure— Peremptory Challenges After Purkett V. Elem, 115 S. Ct. 1769 (1995): How To Judge A Book By Its Cover Without Violating Equal Protection, Jason Hendren
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punishing Bias: An Examination Of The Theoretical Foundations Of Bias Crime Statutes, Anthony M. Dillof
Punishing Bias: An Examination Of The Theoretical Foundations Of Bias Crime Statutes, Anthony M. Dillof
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Doma: An Unconstitutional Establishment Of Fundamentalist Christianity, James M. Donovan
Doma: An Unconstitutional Establishment Of Fundamentalist Christianity, James M. Donovan
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
According to the text of the Act, DOMA's purposes are "to define and protect the institution of marriage," where marriage is defined to exclude same-sex partners. To be constitutionally valid under the Establishment Clause, this notion that heterosexual marriages require "protection" from gay and lesbian persons must spring from a secular and not religious source. This Article posits that DOMA has crossed this forbidden line between the secular and the religious. DOMA, motivated and supported by fundamentalist Christian ideology, and lacking any genuine secular goals or justifications, betrays the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Naming The Grotesque Body In The "Nascent Jurisprudence Of Transsexualism", Richard F. Storrow
Naming The Grotesque Body In The "Nascent Jurisprudence Of Transsexualism", Richard F. Storrow
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
After a description of an analytical framework constructed of theories drawn from the writings of Mikhail Bahktin, Roland Barthes, and Sigmund Freud, this Article discusses the discrepancies in courts' use of medical authority in cases considering the rights of transsexuals and then analyzes courts' ultimate refusal to recognize transsexuals' psychological sex. The thrust of this Article is an examination of the forces compelling such inconsistencies. The result is an analysis which interweaves medical, juridical, psychological and mythic perspectives to disclose the underpinnings of courts' antipathy toward transsexuals.