Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Affirmative action (1)
- Antidiscrimination (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Colorblindness (1)
- Discrimination (1)
-
- Employment discrimination law (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Equality (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Georgia v. McCollum (1)
- Jury selection (1)
- Justice (1)
- Libertarianism (1)
- Liberty (1)
- Minorities (1)
- Peremptory challenge (1)
- Powers v. Ohio (1)
- Race (1)
- Race discrimination (1)
- Rational discrimination (1)
- Rodney King (1)
- Sex discrimination (1)
- Voir dire (1)
- Women (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Rights Held Hostage: Race, Ideology And The Peremptory Challenge, Kenneth B. Nunn
Rights Held Hostage: Race, Ideology And The Peremptory Challenge, Kenneth B. Nunn
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article addresses the Supreme Court's application of the Equal Protection Clause to the selection of juries in criminal trials. Focusing on Black-white relations, it takes the position that efforts to eliminate racial discrimination in jury selection are successful only to the extent that they also eliminate the result of the discrimination- racial subjugation of Blacks through the criminal justice process. By this measure, the Supreme Court's recent jury selection cases are an abject failure.
Liberty Vs. Equality: In Defense Of Privileged White Males, Nancy E. Dowd
Liberty Vs. Equality: In Defense Of Privileged White Males, Nancy E. Dowd
UF Law Faculty Publications
In this book review, Professor Dowd reviews Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws, by Richard A. Epstein (1992). First, Professor Dowd sets forth the thesis and arguments of Epstein’s book and explores her general criticisms in more detail. Next, she explores Epstein’s core argument pitting liberty against equality from two perspectives: that of the privileged white male and that of minorities and women. Finally, Professor Dowd argues that Epstein’s position cannot be viewed as an argument that most minorities or women would make, as it fails to take account of their stories.