Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ABA (1)
- APA (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Association of National Advertisers v. FTC (1)
- Beacon Theatres Inc. v. Westover (1)
-
- Bernstein v. Universal Pictures (1)
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the FederalBureau of Narcotic (1)
- Cale v. City of Covington (1)
- Carlson v. Green (1)
- City of Charlotte v. Local 660 (1)
- City of Kenosha v. Bruno (1)
- Cort v. Ash (1)
- Dairy Queen Inc. v. Wood (1)
- Davis v. Passman (1)
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines Inc. v. United States (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Geller v. FCC (1)
- Gyles v. Wilcox Barrow & Nutt (1)
- ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. IBM Corp (1)
- In re Boise Cascade Securities Litigation (1)
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation (1)
- In re United States Financial Securities Litigation (1)
- International Association of Firefighters (1)
- Judicial Council (1)
- Mathews v. Eldridge (1)
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC (1)
- Monell v. Department of Social Services (1)
- Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle (1)
- NEPA (1)
- National Environmental Policy Act (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Counter Revolution In The Federal Courts Of Appeal - The Aftermath Of Vermont Yankee, Jon A. Mueller
Counter Revolution In The Federal Courts Of Appeal - The Aftermath Of Vermont Yankee, Jon A. Mueller
University of Richmond Law Review
In recent years, there has been growing judicial concern about the fairness of action by administrative agencies and the ability of courts to effectively review this action. This concern stems from the increased use of informal procedures by agencies promulgating rules or orders, to accomplish the congressional objectives set out in their substantive statutes. In response, certain federal courts of appeal have begun to impose upon these agencies more procedural safeguards than are required by either the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) or substantive statutes. These judicially imposed safeguards are more commonly known as hybrid procedures.
Non-Jury Trial Of Civil Litigation: Justifying A Complexity Exception To The Seventh Amendment, Barrett E. Pope
Non-Jury Trial Of Civil Litigation: Justifying A Complexity Exception To The Seventh Amendment, Barrett E. Pope
University of Richmond Law Review
The seventh amendment to the United States Constitution states that "[i]n Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved."' When Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the right to jury trial at common law remained undisturbed.
When Cops Are Robbers-Municipal Liability For Police Misconduct Under Section 1983 And Bivens, Brenda D. Crocker
When Cops Are Robbers-Municipal Liability For Police Misconduct Under Section 1983 And Bivens, Brenda D. Crocker
University of Richmond Law Review
Municipalities faced with rising crime rates, tighter budgets and an increasingly vocal populace often are pressed to make policy decisions which sacrifice important interests. When fiscal considerations predominate, there arises the danger that local police departments will be unable to fulfill their duty to ensure order in society without disturbing citizens' enjoyment of their civil rights. Until recently, improperly trained, supervised or disciplined police of- ficers merely subjected municipalities to embarrassment. However, with increasing success, citizens are arguing that they should be awarded damages against the municipality in every case where their civil rights have been deprived through police misconduct. …
The Virginia Judicial Council's Intermediate Appellate Court Proposal, Martha B. Brissette
The Virginia Judicial Council's Intermediate Appellate Court Proposal, Martha B. Brissette
University of Richmond Law Review
The ever-expanding volume of appellate litigation in Virginia has engendered a crisis in appellate justice in this state which can be adequately addressed only by the creation of an intermediate appellate court. Not only is Virginia the most populous state without such an intermediate court, its highest court also has the largest caseload of any single state appellate court.