Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Business Organizations Law

Michigan Law Review

Journal

1936

McCandless v. Furlaud

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Corporations-Liability Of Promoters For Secret Profit Jun 1936

Corporations-Liability Of Promoters For Secret Profit

Michigan Law Review

In view of the peculiar position of control which a promoter occupies in relation to the proposed corporation, with resultant opportunities for making unconscionable profits, courts have uniformly regarded him as standing in a fiduciary relationship toward the corporation. Accordingly, when a promoter seeks to make a profit from a transfer of property to the corporation, he must obtain the consent of the latter under penalty of having to disgorge such profit at a later time at the suit of the corporation itself or persons acting in the latter's behalf. Such liability is to be distinguished from the liability of …


Corporations - Rights Of Creditors Of Insolvent Corporation - Greater Than Rights Of Corporation Jun 1936

Corporations - Rights Of Creditors Of Insolvent Corporation - Greater Than Rights Of Corporation

Michigan Law Review

The dissenting and majority opinions of Justices Roberts and Cardozo in the recent case of McCandless v. Furlaud are illustrative of basically divergent conceptions of the status and function of the corporate receiver. In the following examination and evaluation of these conflicting positions, attention will be directed chiefly to those situations involving the problem of promoter's profits. The language and attitude of the courts, however, is typical of that adopted in all cases in which the questions considered arise and the conclusions suggested are of general application.