Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody (1)
- Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1)
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
- Consumer Credit Protection Act (1)
-
- Continental T.V. v. GTE Sylvania (1)
- Equal Credit Opportunity Act (1)
- Griggs v. Duke Power Company (1)
- Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois (1)
- National Commission on Consumer Finance (1)
- Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Co (1)
- Powell v. Tilson (1)
- Regulation B (1)
- United States Steel Corp. v. Fortner Enterprises (1)
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Socking It To Plaintiffs: Supreme Court Antitrust Decisions In 1976-77 Term, Jeff Miles
Socking It To Plaintiffs: Supreme Court Antitrust Decisions In 1976-77 Term, Jeff Miles
University of Richmond Law Review
Those persons who delve into the sometimes esoteric and sometimes shockingly practical world of the antitrust laws have noticed a markedly increased emphasis on both private and public enforcement efforts in recent years. One need look no further than the attacks against groups once thought to be immune, I action by Congress, and substantially increased state enforcement to see a vigorous movement to assure that no violation goes unnoticed and unpunished, and that private parties are compensated three-fold for injuries suffered by reason of illegal anticompetitive activity.
Equal Credit Opportunity Act Amendments Of 1976, Judith B. Henry
Equal Credit Opportunity Act Amendments Of 1976, Judith B. Henry
University of Richmond Law Review
It would be difficult to exaggerate the role of credit in today's society. But for the availability of credit, it would be impossible for most Americans to obtain an education, purchase a car, own a home, or start a business. Because of the increasing popularity of credit cards, credit is relied on daily in consumer transactions. Yet a number of persons have been unable to obtain credit, not because of an inability to repay, but because of their membership in a particular class.