Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights Act (2)
- Allen v. State Board of Elections (1)
- City of Portsmouth v. City of Chesapeake (1)
- City of Richmond v. United States (1)
- Civil Service Commission (1)
-
- Daniel v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Union (1)
- EEOC (1)
- ERISA (1)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Act (1)
- FNS (1)
- Food and Nutrition Service (1)
- Gaston County v. United States (1)
- Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1)
- Grubbs v. Butz (1)
- Hackley v. Johnson (1)
- Holt v. City of Richmond (1)
- Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh (1)
- IRS (1)
- Internal Revenue Service (1)
- InternationalAssociation of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Garwood Industries (1)
- Perkins v. Matthews (1)
- Reynolds v. Sims (1)
- Secretary of Labor (1)
- South Carolina v. Katzenbach (1)
- Supervisors of Washington County v. Saltville Land Co. (1)
- Voting Rights Act (1)
- WPPDA (1)
- Welfare Pension Plans Disclosure Act (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Securing A Valid Annexation In Virginia: State And Federal Requirements
Securing A Valid Annexation In Virginia: State And Federal Requirements
University of Richmond Law Review
Municipal expansion by the annexation of surrounding territory involves two separate and distinct procedures in Virginia. Due to the Commonwealth's coverage under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, municipalities seeking annexation must obtain federal approval in addition to satisfying the requirements of state law. Compliance with the Act requires an affirmative showing that the expansion is nondiscriminatory in both its purposes and effects with regard to minority voting strength. Failure to meet these fed- eral requirements will invalidate the annexation, irrespective of its compliance with state law. This note will first examine the law of annexation in Virginia, highlighting its …
Administrative Law-Incompleted Title Vii Administrative Proceedings Not-Terminated By Judicial Review- Federal Employee May Present New Evidence In Court
University of Richmond Law Review
The Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 (EEOA) extended certain provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to federal employees. One such provision extended is contained in § 717(c) . Under this section a federal employee alleging employment discrimination is granted access to a United States district court in two situations: when administrative relief is not provided within 180 days after the filing of the original complaint; or, upon final action being taken by either the agency involved or the Civil Service Commission.
The "Elaborate Interweaving Of Jurisdiction:" Labor And Tax Administration And Enforcement Of Erisa And Beyond, John W. Lee
The "Elaborate Interweaving Of Jurisdiction:" Labor And Tax Administration And Enforcement Of Erisa And Beyond, John W. Lee
University of Richmond Law Review
On Labor Day 1974, President Ford signed into law~the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, commonly known by its acronym ERISA. The genesis of ERISA is found in a study released in 1965 by the President's Committee on Corporate Pension Fund and Other Private Retirement and Welfare Programs, titled "Public Policy and Private Pension Programs-A Report to the President on Private Employee Retirement Plans." The Committee had been established in 1962 by President Kennedy in recognition of the growth of the pension industry and the need for reform. The report made recommendations as to vesting; funding; termination insurance and …