Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (3)
- ALJ (2)
- Adjudication (1)
- Administrative judge (1)
- Administrative law judge (1)
-
- Agency adjudication (1)
- Aggregate litigation (1)
- Article II (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Behavioral science (1)
- Benefit-cost analysis (1)
- Brady v. Maryland (1)
- CBA (1)
- CHOICE Act (1)
- Chevron deference (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Civil service (1)
- Class action (1)
- Cognitive bias (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Due process (1)
- Gabriel Weil (1)
- Guardian (1)
- Hearing officer (1)
- Impartiality (1)
- Independent watchdog (1)
- Individual Preferences in Policy Analysis: A Normative Framework (1)
- Individual preferences (1)
- Judicial review (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Individual Preferences In Policy Analysis: A Normative Framework, Gabriel Weil
Individual Preferences In Policy Analysis: A Normative Framework, Gabriel Weil
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Guardian Trustee In Bankruptcy Courts And Beyond, Lindsey Simon
The Guardian Trustee In Bankruptcy Courts And Beyond, Lindsey Simon
Scholarly Works
Litigation systems create dangers of unfairness. Citizens worry, and should worry, about exploitive settlements in aggregate litigation, potential biases in administrative proceedings, and troubling power imbalances in criminal trials. Public confidence in adjudicative processes has eroded to an all-time low. This Article explores the untapped potential of adding independent watchdog entities to address systemic threats to the integrity of government decisionmaking. These entities, which I call “guardian trustees,” do not fit within the traditional framework of our adversary system. Though guardian trustees already operate in bankruptcy proceedings, they have thus far received little attention in scholarly literature. This Article begins …
Chevron Abroad, Kent H. Barnett, Lindsey Vinson
Chevron Abroad, Kent H. Barnett, Lindsey Vinson
Scholarly Works
This Article presents our comparative findings of how courts in five other countries review agency statutory interpretation. These comparisons permit us to understand and participate better in current debates about the increasingly controversial Chevron doctrine in American law, whereby courts defer to reasonable agency interpretations of statutes that an agency administers. Those debates concern, among other things, Chevron 's purported inevitability, functioning and normative propriety. Our inquiry into judicial review in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia provides useful and unexpected findings. Chevron, contrary to some scholars' views, is not inevitable because only one of these countries has …
Regulating Impartiality In Agency Adjudication, Kent H. Barnett
Regulating Impartiality In Agency Adjudication, Kent H. Barnett
Scholarly Works
Which should prevail—the Take Care Clause of Article II or the Due Process Clause? To Justice Breyer’s chagrin, the majorities in Lucia v. SEC and Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB expressly declined to resolve whether the U.S. Constitution condones SEC administrative law judges’ and other similarly situated agency adjudicators’ current statutory protection from at-will removal. The crux of the problem is that, on one hand, senior officials may use at-will removal to pressure agency adjudicators and thereby potentially imperil the impartiality that due process requires. On the other hand, Article II limits Congress’s ability to cocoon executive officers, including potentially …