Commentary On Santibanez’S “Strategically Wrong: Bias And Argumentation”,
2016
University of Windsor
Commentary On Santibanez’S “Strategically Wrong: Bias And Argumentation”, Brian Macpherson Dr.
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Tone Kvernbekk’S “Comparing Two Models Of Evidence”,
2016
McMaster University
Commentary On Tone Kvernbekk’S “Comparing Two Models Of Evidence”, David Hitchcock
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On G. Thomas Goodnight’S “Blind Spots, Moral Hazards & Wounded Narratives”,
2016
unibersoty of windsor
Commentary On G. Thomas Goodnight’S “Blind Spots, Moral Hazards & Wounded Narratives”, Christopher W. Tindale, Christopher W. Tindale
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On: Frank Zenkers’S “The Polysemy Of ‘Fallacy’– Or ‘Bias’, For That Matter”,
2016
University Sorbonne-Nouvelle
Commentary On: Frank Zenkers’S “The Polysemy Of ‘Fallacy’– Or ‘Bias’, For That Matter”, Michel Dufour
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Arguments From Expert Opinion And Persistent Bias,
2016
Edgewood College
Commentary On Arguments From Expert Opinion And Persistent Bias, John Fields
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Visser On Computer Support For Pragma-Dialectic Argumentation Analysis,
2016
University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Commentary On Visser On Computer Support For Pragma-Dialectic Argumentation Analysis, Ami Mamolo
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On ‘On Being Objective: Hard Data, Soft Data And Baseball’,
2016
University of Auckland
Commentary On ‘On Being Objective: Hard Data, Soft Data And Baseball’, Tim Dare
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On “Compassion, Authority And Baby Talk: Prosody And Objectivity",
2016
University of Kansas Main Campus
Commentary On “Compassion, Authority And Baby Talk: Prosody And Objectivity", Beth Innocenti
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Khameiel Al Tamimi's "Evaluating Narrative Arguments",
2016
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Commentary On Khameiel Al Tamimi's "Evaluating Narrative Arguments", Paula Olmos
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On The Emotional Life Of Reason: Exploring Conceptions Of Objectivity,
2016
University of Windsor
Commentary On The Emotional Life Of Reason: Exploring Conceptions Of Objectivity, Moira Howes
OSSA Conference Archive
Robert Pinto and Laura Pinto advance a non-binary account of reason and emotion in the reasoning process and argue for a naturalistic understanding of objectivity that will allow for the evaluation of emotions as reasonable. Pinto and Pinto’s promising argument generates important and productive lines of inquiry. I suggest a few such lines of inquiry, including the idea that it may be important to support reflexivity and interpretive community with equanimity; that we should further examine the potential of new ideals of objectivity that explicitly incorporate emotion and virtue; and finally, that we should craft methodologies to deepen our understanding …
Commentary On Ami Mamolo On Argumentation And Infinity,
2016
University of Windsor
Commentary On Ami Mamolo On Argumentation And Infinity, Daniel H. Cohen
OSSA Conference Archive
There is more to mathematics than proofs; there are also arguments, which means that mathematicians are human arguers complete with their biases. Among those biases is a preference for beauty, It is a bias insofar as it is a deaprture from objectivity, but it is benign, accounting for the popularity of Cantor's "Paradise" of non-denumerable infinities as a travel destination for mathematicians and the relatively little interest in Robinson's infinitesimals.
Commentary On ‘Approaching Logos Among Reason, Rationality And Reasonable’,
2016
University of Windsor
Commentary On ‘Approaching Logos Among Reason, Rationality And Reasonable’, Ralph Johnson
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On “On Appeals To (Visual) Models”: Appeals To Visual Models – An Epistemological Reconstruction Of An Argument Type,
2016
University of Siena
Commentary On “On Appeals To (Visual) Models”: Appeals To Visual Models – An Epistemological Reconstruction Of An Argument Type, Christoph Lumer
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On “Argumentation Mining In Parliamentary Discourse”,
2016
University of Fraser Valley
Commentary On “Argumentation Mining In Parliamentary Discourse”, Moira Kloster
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Reply To Commentary On “Argumentation Mining In Parliamentary Discourse”,
2016
University of Toronto
Reply To Commentary On “Argumentation Mining In Parliamentary Discourse”, Nona Naderi
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Reply To Commentary On “Transsubjectivity”,
2016
McMaster University
Reply To Commentary On “Transsubjectivity”, David Hitchcock
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On “The Stance Of Personal Public Apology”: Transgression & Apologia: Disjoining Standpoints Of Justice, Publicity And Drama,
2016
University of Southern California
Commentary On “The Stance Of Personal Public Apology”: Transgression & Apologia: Disjoining Standpoints Of Justice, Publicity And Drama, G Thomas Goodnight
OSSA Conference Archive
This paper responds to Professor Martha Cheng’s standpoint analysis of transgression and apologia in three twenty first century media-promoted controversies: Tiger Woods, Paula Deen, and Bryan Williams. Argument strategies are differentiated by genres that aim at justice, publicity, and drama. Forensics, public relations, and entertainment mix across media apparatus. I emphasize the disjunctures among these acts of argument and thereby provide an alternative to analysis and synthesis of the argumentation as discourse.
Commentary On “America Vs. Apple: The Argumentative Function Of Metonyms”: Defeasible Rhetoric: Networks, Security, & Metonyms,
2016
University of Southern California
Commentary On “America Vs. Apple: The Argumentative Function Of Metonyms”: Defeasible Rhetoric: Networks, Security, & Metonyms, G Thomas Goodnight
OSSA Conference Archive
The government took Apple to court to demand decryption of a terrorist cell phone. The warrant issued rested on the assumption that law enforcement should be able to do its work through extension of “access” across the population of encrypted iphones. Each phone exists as a defeasible (Rescher 1977) site whose cooperation (access) is assumed to be opened by the the manufacturer if directed to do so by government, unless cause can be shown otherwise. Defeasible argument couples rhetorically with metonymic force as a powerful argument trajectory. The reversal of burden of proof, now placed on the company to …
Reply To Commentary On Constructing A Periodic Table Of Arguments,
2016
University of Amsterdam
Reply To Commentary On Constructing A Periodic Table Of Arguments, Jean H.M. Wagemans
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
When Different Perspectives Interact: A Historical Account Of Informal Logic Between 1983 And 1987,
2016
Showa Women's University
When Different Perspectives Interact: A Historical Account Of Informal Logic Between 1983 And 1987, Takuzo Konishi
OSSA Conference Archive
This paper will describe what happened to the community of informal logicians between 1983 and 1987, when they started to interact with communication scholars, rhetoricians and Pragma-Dialecticians. Special attention will be paid to key events, such as the Second International Symposiums on Informal Logic (SISIL), the founding of AILACT (Association for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking) in 1983, the start of journal Informal logic in 1984, and the international conference on argumentation held at Amsterdam in 1986.
